- sg16-avd - lists.packetizer.com

Re: Gateway Decomposition
by Ami Amir 17 Oct '98

17 Oct '98

Hi All Small "European/Middle Eastern" request -try not to schedule evening calls so that we can join. Anothe request - can someone pots again the "GAteway Decomposition" document? I only have a hard copy somewhere. Thanks Ami Gary A. Thom wrote: > > ---------- > > From: Gary A. Thom[SMTP:GTHOM@DELTA-INFO.COM] > > Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 10:27:22 AM > > To: ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.intel.com > > Subject: Re: Contact Info requested > > Auto forwarded by a Rule > > > Tom, > > Please include me also. > > Gary > ------------------------------------------------------ > Name : Gary A. Thom > Company: Delta Information Systems, Inc. > Address: 300 Welsh Rd., Bldg 3 > Horsham, PA 19044 USA > Phone : +1-215-657-5270 Fax : +1-215-657-5273 > E-mail : gthom(a)delta-info.com > ------------------------------------------------------

1 0

[Q] Differences between 'ad hoc multipoint conf' and 'multipoint conf'.
by Lee Hyoung soo 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Hi, Can you tell me the differences between 'ad hoc multipoint conference' and 'multipoint conference'? According to the recommendation of H.323 V2, ad hoc multipoint conference : An Ad Hoc Multipoint conference was a point-to-point conference that had been expanded into a multipoint conference at some time during the call. multipoint conference : A Multipoint conference is a conference between three or more terminals. Any multipoint conference can begin with three or more terminals without expansion from point-to-point conference? Best wishes, soo Nada Research Co., Ltd. Korea.

1 0

Re: conference call on GW decompostion
by Kumar, Vineet 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Please include me in the conference call. Thanks. vineet ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Vineet Kumar vineet.kumar(a)intel.com Intel Corporation, JF3-212 (+1) 503-264-3439 (phone) Hillsboro, OR 97124-5961 (+1) 503-264-3375 (fax) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Reid [SMTP:mreid@VIDEOSERVER.COM] > Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 1:53 PM > To: ITU-SG16(a)MAILBAG.INTEL.COM > Subject: > > Dear Colleagues, > > I would like to invite you to participate in an audio call, Tuesday > October > 20th from 11AM to 1PM EST to discuss our work plan for the study of > gateway > decomposition as outlined in TD 89 (WP2). > > The goals of the audio call will be to identify what work items we need to > completed and in what order should we attack them. Once we have an agreed > to > work plan, we can talk about building an architecture document and the > specific requirements of each interface. > > As a place to start the discussions, I think we need the following > (referenced to TD 89): > > New Protocols: > ***************** > Interface A - Device Control Interface > > New H.246 Annexes: > ************************ > 1) H.323 to Voice/Voiceband Terminals = The breakdown of the media. How > DTMF > is converted to/from UserInputIndication messages, etc. (There is a draft > of > this in the current H.246 Annex B) > 2) H.323 to SS7 (Similar to Q.699 - a Q.931 to ISUP conversion spec) > 3) H.323 to Q.931 (Similar to the section in Annex A for H.320) > > Interface B, C, D > ******************** > For the Proposed Interfaces B, C, and D. Given that the messages passing > across these interfaces must reflect all of the content of the signaling > that the respective signaling functions receive from and send to extern > entities, aren't these protocols modified or extended ISUP for Interface > D, > modified or extended Q.931 for Interface C, and modified or extended H.225 > for Interface B? For C & D, can they be the real protocols if carried on a > T1 and some derivation of them if running over TCP/IP? > > Please try and get all attendee requests in by Monday the 19th at 12:00 > Noon > EST so that I can make the proper arrangements. I will send port > assignments > later that day. Here is a summary of attendees so far: > > 1) G. Thom > 2) S. Nayak > 3) R. Badri > 4) P Kallur > 5) K. Hedayat > 6) R Spitzer > 7) R Chopra > 8) A Amir > 9) R Even > 10) H Liu > 11) J Yeh > 12) R Radhika > 13) B Bell > 14) T Taylor > 15) G Freundlich > 16) M Reid/B Hill/G Kajos > > All comments welcome, > > Mark Reid > 1-781-505-2368 > mreid(a)videoserver.com > > Bryan Hill > 1-781-505-2159 > bhill(a)videoserver.com

1 0

None
by Roy Spitzer 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Mark, Where can I find a copy of TD 89 and any other draft documents that will be discussed in this meeting. Regards, Roy Roy Spitzer Telogy Networks Phone (301) 515-6531 20250 Century Boulevard Fax: (301) 515-7954 Germantown, Maryland 20874 email: rspitzer(a)telogy.com -----Original Message----- From: Mark Reid [mailto:mreid@VIDEOSERVER.COM] Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 4:53 PM To: ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.INTEL.com Subject: Dear Colleagues, I would like to invite you to participate in an audio call, Tuesday October 20th from 11AM to 1PM EST to discuss our work plan for the study of gateway decomposition as outlined in TD 89 (WP2). The goals of the audio call will be to identify what work items we need to completed and in what order should we attack them. Once we have an agreed to work plan, we can talk about building an architecture document and the specific requirements of each interface. As a place to start the discussions, I think we need the following (referenced to TD 89): New Protocols: ***************** Interface A - Device Control Interface New H.246 Annexes: ************************ 1) H.323 to Voice/Voiceband Terminals = The breakdown of the media. How DTMF is converted to/from UserInputIndication messages, etc. (There is a draft of this in the current H.246 Annex B) 2) H.323 to SS7 (Similar to Q.699 - a Q.931 to ISUP conversion spec) 3) H.323 to Q.931 (Similar to the section in Annex A for H.320) Interface B, C, D ******************** For the Proposed Interfaces B, C, and D. Given that the messages passing across these interfaces must reflect all of the content of the signaling that the respective signaling functions receive from and send to extern entities, aren't these protocols modified or extended ISUP for Interface D, modified or extended Q.931 for Interface C, and modified or extended H.225 for Interface B? For C & D, can they be the real protocols if carried on a T1 and some derivation of them if running over TCP/IP? Please try and get all attendee requests in by Monday the 19th at 12:00 Noon EST so that I can make the proper arrangements. I will send port assignments later that day. Here is a summary of attendees so far: 1) G. Thom 2) S. Nayak 3) R. Badri 4) P Kallur 5) K. Hedayat 6) R Spitzer 7) R Chopra 8) A Amir 9) R Even 10) H Liu 11) J Yeh 12) R Radhika 13) B Bell 14) T Taylor 15) G Freundlich 16) M Reid/B Hill/G Kajos All comments welcome, Mark Reid 1-781-505-2368 mreid(a)videoserver.com Bryan Hill 1-781-505-2159 bhill(a)videoserver.com

1 0

Re: FYI: ITU SG16 discussion on "gateway decomposition"
by Don Bellenger 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

I would like to attend this call. Thanks, Don Bellenger >Mark Reid <mreid(a)VIDEOSERVER.COM> on 10/16/98 01:52:34 PM > >Please respond to Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study > Group 16 <ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.intel.com> > >To: ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.intel.com >cc: (Ismail Dalgic/HQ/3Com) >Subject: > > > > >Note: Some recipients have been dropped due to syntax errors. >Please refer to the "$AdditionalHeaders" item for the complete headers. > > > >Dear Colleagues, > >I would like to invite you to participate in an audio call, Tuesday October >20th from 11AM to 1PM EST to discuss our work plan for the study of gateway >decomposition as outlined in TD 89 (WP2). > >The goals of the audio call will be to identify what work items we need to >completed and in what order should we attack them. Once we have an agreed >to >work plan, we can talk about building an architecture document and the >specific requirements of each interface. > >As a place to start the discussions, I think we need the following >(referenced to TD 89): > >New Protocols: >***************** >Interface A - Device Control Interface > >New H.246 Annexes: >************************ >1) H.323 to Voice/Voiceband Terminals = The breakdown of the media. How >DTMF >is converted to/from UserInputIndication messages, etc. (There is a draft >of >this in the current H.246 Annex B) >2) H.323 to SS7 (Similar to Q.699 - a Q.931 to ISUP conversion spec) >3) H.323 to Q.931 (Similar to the section in Annex A for H.320) > >Interface B, C, D >******************** >For the Proposed Interfaces B, C, and D. Given that the messages passing >across these interfaces must reflect all of the content of the signaling >that the respective signaling functions receive from and send to extern >entities, aren't these protocols modified or extended ISUP for Interface D, >modified or extended Q.931 for Interface C, and modified or extended H.225 >for Interface B? For C & D, can they be the real protocols if carried on a >T1 and some derivation of them if running over TCP/IP? > >Please try and get all attendee requests in by Monday the 19th at 12:00 >Noon >EST so that I can make the proper arrangements. I will send port >assignments >later that day. Here is a summary of attendees so far: > >1) G. Thom >2) S. Nayak >3) R. Badri >4) P Kallur >5) K. Hedayat >6) R Spitzer >7) R Chopra >8) A Amir >9) R Even >10) H Liu >11) J Yeh >12) R Radhika >13) B Bell >14) T Taylor >15) G Freundlich >16) M Reid/B Hill/G Kajos > >All comments welcome, > >Mark Reid >1-781-505-2368 >mreid(a)videoserver.com > >Bryan Hill >1-781-505-2159 >bhill(a)videoserver.com

1 0

Re: Gateway Decomposition
by Callaghan, Robert 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Mark, Please include me. Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------ Robert Callaghan Siemens Information & Communication Networks Tel: +1.561.997.3756 Fax: +1.561.997.3403 Email: Robert.Callaghan(a)Siemenscom.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Mark Reid [mailto:mreid@VIDEOSERVER.COM] Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 4:53 PM To: ITU-SG16(a)MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Gateway Decomposition Dear Colleagues, I would like to invite you to participate in an audio call, Tuesday October 20th from 11AM to 1PM EST to discuss our work plan for the study of gateway decomposition as outlined in TD 89 (WP2). The goals of the audio call will be to identify what work items we need to completed and in what order should we attack them. Once we have an agreed to work plan, we can talk about building an architecture document and the specific requirements of each interface. As a place to start the discussions, I think we need the following (referenced to TD 89): New Protocols: ***************** Interface A - Device Control Interface New H.246 Annexes: ************************ 1) H.323 to Voice/Voiceband Terminals = The breakdown of the media. How DTMF is converted to/from UserInputIndication messages, etc. (There is a draft of this in the current H.246 Annex B) 2) H.323 to SS7 (Similar to Q.699 - a Q.931 to ISUP conversion spec) 3) H.323 to Q.931 (Similar to the section in Annex A for H.320) Interface B, C, D ******************** For the Proposed Interfaces B, C, and D. Given that the messages passing across these interfaces must reflect all of the content of the signaling that the respective signaling functions receive from and send to extern entities, aren't these protocols modified or extended ISUP for Interface D, modified or extended Q.931 for Interface C, and modified or extended H.225 for Interface B? For C & D, can they be the real protocols if carried on a T1 and some derivation of them if running over TCP/IP? Please try and get all attendee requests in by Monday the 19th at 12:00 Noon EST so that I can make the proper arrangements. I will send port assignments later that day. Here is a summary of attendees so far: 1) G. Thom 2) S. Nayak 3) R. Badri 4) P Kallur 5) K. Hedayat 6) R Spitzer 7) R Chopra 8) A Amir 9) R Even 10) H Liu 11) J Yeh 12) R Radhika 13) B Bell 14) T Taylor 15) G Freundlich 16) M Reid/B Hill/G Kajos All comments welcome, Mark Reid 1-781-505-2368 mreid(a)videoserver.com Bryan Hill 1-781-505-2159 bhill(a)videoserver.com

1 0

None
by Rahul Chopra 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Mark: Would appreciate if you can please let me know the congf. bridge details. Thanks. Rahul > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Reid [SMTP:mreid@VIDEOSERVER.COM] > Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 4:53 PM > To: ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.intel.com > Subject: > > Dear Colleagues, > > I would like to invite you to participate in an audio call, Tuesday > October > 20th from 11AM to 1PM EST to discuss our work plan for the study of > gateway > decomposition as outlined in TD 89 (WP2). > > The goals of the audio call will be to identify what work items we need to > completed and in what order should we attack them. Once we have an agreed > to > work plan, we can talk about building an architecture document and the > specific requirements of each interface. > > As a place to start the discussions, I think we need the following > (referenced to TD 89): > > New Protocols: > ***************** > Interface A - Device Control Interface > > New H.246 Annexes: > ************************ > 1) H.323 to Voice/Voiceband Terminals = The breakdown of the media. How > DTMF > is converted to/from UserInputIndication messages, etc. (There is a draft > of > this in the current H.246 Annex B) > 2) H.323 to SS7 (Similar to Q.699 - a Q.931 to ISUP conversion spec) > 3) H.323 to Q.931 (Similar to the section in Annex A for H.320) > > Interface B, C, D > ******************** > For the Proposed Interfaces B, C, and D. Given that the messages passing > across these interfaces must reflect all of the content of the signaling > that the respective signaling functions receive from and send to extern > entities, aren't these protocols modified or extended ISUP for Interface > D, > modified or extended Q.931 for Interface C, and modified or extended H.225 > for Interface B? For C & D, can they be the real protocols if carried on a > T1 and some derivation of them if running over TCP/IP? > > Please try and get all attendee requests in by Monday the 19th at 12:00 > Noon > EST so that I can make the proper arrangements. I will send port > assignments > later that day. Here is a summary of attendees so far: > > 1) G. Thom > 2) S. Nayak > 3) R. Badri > 4) P Kallur > 5) K. Hedayat > 6) R Spitzer > 7) R Chopra > 8) A Amir > 9) R Even > 10) H Liu > 11) J Yeh > 12) R Radhika > 13) B Bell > 14) T Taylor > 15) G Freundlich > 16) M Reid/B Hill/G Kajos > > All comments welcome, > > Mark Reid > 1-781-505-2368 > mreid(a)videoserver.com > > Bryan Hill > 1-781-505-2159 > bhill(a)videoserver.com

1 0

Re: Contact Info requested
by Kaynam Hedayat 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Mr. Taylor, Please include me in the call as well. Thank you. Kaynam Hedayat PictureTel Corporation Rahul Chopra <rchopra(a)NETSPEAK.COM> on 10/16/98 09:36:36 AM Please respond to Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study Group 16 <ITU-SG16(a)MAILBAG.INTEL.COM> To: ITU-SG16(a)MAILBAG.INTEL.COM cc: (bcc: Kaynam Hedayat/PicTel) Subject: Re: Contact Info requested Would appreciate if you included me. Thanks. Rahul 561-347-2493 > > Jenn > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ > ______ Jenn Yeh, Staff Engineer > /_____/\ > /_____\\ \ SUN Microsystems Inc. > /_____\ \\ / 140 Scott Drive, MS UMPK03-213 > /_____/ \/ / / Menlo Park, CA 94025 > /_____/ / \//\ > \_____\//\ / / email: jenn.yeh(a)eng.sun.com > \_____/ / /\ / phone: +1.650.688.9404 > \_____/ \\ \ fax: +1.650-688-9007 > \_____\ \\ > \_____\/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:34:41 -0400 > > From: "Roy, Radhika R, ALINT" <rrroy(a)ATT.COM> > > Subject: Re: Contact Info requested > > To: ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.intel.com > > > > Tom: > > > > Please include me in the conference call. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Radhika R. Roy > > AT&T, USA > > > > Tel: +1 732 949 8657 > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > From: Tom-PT Taylor[SMTP:Tom-PT.Taylor.taylor@NT.COM] > > > Reply To: Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study > Group > > > 16 > > > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 1998 12:53 PM > > > To: ITU-SG16(a)MAILBAG.INTEL.COM > > > Subject: Contact Info requested > > > > > > What's the contact info for Mark Reid? He was supposed to set up a > > > kick-off > > > conference call for the Gateway Decomposition study. I wanted to > check on > > > status and set up the call myself if he is too busy. > > > > > > Tom Taylor > > > E-mail: taylor(a)nortel.com (internally Tom-PT Taylor) > > > Tel.: +1 613 765 4167 (internally 395-4167) > > > FAX: +1 613 763 7236 (internally 393-7236) > > >

3 2

Re: Contact Info requested
by Prasad Kallur 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Hi, Please include me on the list too. Thanks, Prasad Kallur Prasad Kallur, Trillium Digital Systems Engineering Manager, 12100, Wilshire Blvd, Tel : (310)-442-9222, Suite 1800, LA, CA-90025 Fax : (310)-442-1162, prasad(a)trillim.com Web:http://www.trillium.com -----Original Message----- From: Roy Spitzer [mailto:rspitzer@TELOGY.COM] Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 7:47 AM To: ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.intel.com Subject: Re: Contact Info requested Please include me in on the conference call and any distribution list for Gateway Decomposition. Regards, Roy Roy Spitzer Telogy Networks Phone (301) 515-6531 20250 Century Boulevard Fax: (301) 515-7954 Germantown, Maryland 20874 email: rspitzer(a)telogy.com

1 0

Re: Contact Info requested
by Roy Spitzer 16 Oct '98

16 Oct '98

Please include me in on the conference call and any distribution list for Gateway Decomposition. Regards, Roy Roy Spitzer Telogy Networks Phone (301) 515-6531 20250 Century Boulevard Fax: (301) 515-7954 Germantown, Maryland 20874 email: rspitzer(a)telogy.com

1 0