Dear Mr. Li, experts,
we provided you with the draft of the technical comparison
document. A lot of time elapsed and now you don't consider
it realistic anymore to do this joint work. We regret your
resistance. The consequence would be wasting the time of the
group at the meeting with what we were supposed to do in advance.
Please reconsider your answer and the time delay caused
by you with it.
The document attached to your last email by mistake I guess
was an old collection of values. The more comprehensive test
scenario document is APC-1993r2, attached to this email.
It will be provided as document AVD-2059 at the next meeting.
Best Wishes
Gero Baese
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Adam Li [mailto:adamli@icsl.ucla.edu]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2001 11:55
> An: Baese Gero; ITU-SG16(a)mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM
> Cc: Tao Tian; Jay Fahlen; John D. Villasenor; Barry Aronson; Paul E.
> Jones; Jeong-Hoon Park; So Youg Kim; Yung Lyul Lee
> Betreff: RE: Video codec for H.323 Annex I
>
> Mr. Baese, experts,
>
> For the testing condition document, I believe we have settled
> on most of the
> issues. So here is the testing document, and please take a
> look and let me
> know if there is anything else that we need to discuss.
>
> About the feature comparison document, I suggest that we both draft
> documents for the point to point comparisons with the
> technical reasoning.
> From the current schedule situation, it seems that it is more
> realistic for
> us to submit two independent documents. We can go over them
> at the meeting,
> and combine them then if necessary.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> ----------
> Adam H. Li
> Image Communication Lab (310) 825-5178 (Lab)
> University of California, Los Angeles (310) 825-7928 (Fax)
>
