- sg16-avd - lists.packetizer.com

Hi Mr. Simao, H.245 output text, please public it as a WP1 TD, Thank you.
by wang.liang12＠zte.com.cn 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Hi Mr. Simao, The attachment is the H.245 output text. Please public it as a WP1 TD. Thank you. Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.

2 1

Re: [sg16-avd] The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
by Paul E. Jones 16 Feb '15

16 Feb '15

Liang, et al, For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages? For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future. In U.2: * "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association" * there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint" * In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of the paragraph * In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for consistency with the rest of H.245 * change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP”, once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read. * I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4. That said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better. Thanks! Paul ------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12(a)zte.com.cn To: t13sg16q5(a)lists.itu.int; t13sg16q2(a)lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej(a)packetizer.com>; "Botzko, Stephen" <Stephen.Botzko(a)polycom.com> Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it. > > >Hi every experts, > >This is the first version of H.245 output text. >It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. >Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me. > >BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the >Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry. > > > > >Thank you and Best regards, >Liang Wang > > > >-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE >Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail >(and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and >confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). >If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, >distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained >is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please >delete it and notify us immediately.

4 5

Fw: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
by Paul E. Jones 14 Feb '15

14 Feb '15

FYI ------ Forwarded Message ------ From: wang.liang12(a)zte.com.cn To: t13sg16q5(a)lists.itu.int; t13sg16q2(a)lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej(a)packetizer.com>; "Botzko, Stephen" <Stephen.Botzko(a)polycom.com> Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it. Hi every experts, This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me. BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry. Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.

1 0

Fw: [T16ALL] RE: Date for Contributions being uploaded should now be January 2015 (not December 2014)
by Paul E. Jones 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

WP1/16 Experts, Please see this note from Simao. Cheers! Paul ------ Forwarded Message ------ From: "Campos, Simao" <simao.campos(a)itu.int> To: "'t13sg16all(a)lists.itu.int'" <t13sg16all(a)lists.itu.int> Cc: "t13sg16wp1(a)lists.itu.int" <t13sg16wp1(a)lists.itu.int>; "t13sg16wp2(a)lists.itu.int" <t13sg16wp2(a)lists.itu.int>; "t13sg16wp3(a)lists.itu.int" <t13sg16wp3(a)lists.itu.int>; "'t13sg16mgt(a)lists.itu.int'" <t13sg16mgt(a)lists.itu.int> Sent: 1/26/2015 3:31:40 PM Subject: [T16ALL] RE: Date for Contributions being uploaded should now be January 2015 (not December 2014) Dear all A clarification in the 2nd bullet, below (in red). The template I refer there is the template to use when uploading contributions via DDP. Sorry about the lack of precision. Simão From: Campos, Simao Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 14:27 To: 't13sg16all(a)lists.itu.int' Cc:t13sg16wp1@lists.itu.int; t13sg16wp2(a)lists.itu.int; t13sg16wp3(a)lists.itu.int; 't13sg16mgt(a)lists.itu.int' Subject: [T16WP3] FW: Date for Contributions being uploaded should now be January 2015 (not December 2014) Importance: High Dear all As a reminder: · The date that should appear in the upper right corner of uploaded contributions must be January 2015. NotDecember 2014, not February 2014 (no day, only month and year). I received a substantial number of contributions that say that the meeting date is either December 2014, or February 2014. For those, I will need to prepare an R1. · Over the weekend, we also received a number of contributions submitted via DDP that are using the WRONG document template for DDP submissions; for example, C.771 (http://www.itu.int/md/T13-SG16-C-0771/en) uses the e-mail submission or TD generic template. The right template for Contributions submitted via DDP can be downloaded from here: http://www.itu.int/oth/T0A0F000027/en · Finally, I kindly ask that you prefix the title of the contribution with the recommendation number when the contribution refers to an existing work item. Most of the contributions submitted follow this guideline, where applicable. · Contribution numbers: NO trailing zeroes to the left. For example: Bad = COM 16 – C 0751, Good = COM 16 – C 751 (no 0's before 751!) · If you upload a revised version of your document, make sure to add R1, R2, etc to the document number (in TWO places in the document header!) Thank you! Simão PS:Rapporteurs, please forward this message to your respective rapporteur group mailing lists! From: Campos, Simao Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 17:15 To: 't13sg16all(a)lists.itu.int' Subject: [T16ALL] RE: Date for Contributions being uploaded should now be January 2015 (not December 2014) Dear all, Also, when contributions refer to an ongoing work item (or revised Recommendation), kindly prefix the title of the contribution with the recommendation number. For example, for COM16-C.689: · H.248.SCTP: Appendix IV (signalling requirements) - Update of H.248 gateway control protocol requirements This will make it easier to organize our work. Thanks! Simão From: Campos, Simao Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 16:49 To: 't13sg16all(a)lists.itu.int' Subject: Date for Contributions being uploaded should now be January 2015 (not December 2014) Dear all (Happy new year!) Attention! Date for Contributions should now be January 2015, not December 2014!!! Please make sure before you upload that the correct date shows on the cover page. If not, select the date, press shift-F9 and retype as "January 2015". Cheers, Simão ><((((º>.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸ ><((((º>.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>.·´¯`·...¸><((((º> ===================================================================== Simão Ferraz de Campos Neto Counsellor, ITU-T SG 16 International Telecommunication Union Tel: +41-22-730-6805 Place des Nations Fax: +41-22-730-5853 Geneva CH1211 - Switzerland E-mail: simao.campos(a)itu.int On the web: www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com16 ===================================================================== ***** Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty ***** =====================================================================

1 0

Meeting report for Q3/16 and Q5/16 in Seoul now available
by Paul E. Jones 06 Jan '15

06 Jan '15

WP1/16 Experts, The consolidated meeting report for the Seoul meeting is now available: http://ftp3.itu.int/av-arch/avc-site/2013-2016/1411_Seo/AVD-4661.zip I look forward to seeing everyone in Geneva next month. Paul

1 0

Re: [sg16-avd] [T16Q5] Output meeting documents posted
by Paul E. Jones 06 Nov '14

06 Nov '14

Thanks. I've revised the document list (HTML version) accordingly. Paul ------ Original Message ------ From: "Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)" <albrecht.schwarz(a)alcatel-lucent.com> To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej(a)packetizer.com>; "sg16-avd(a)lists.packetizer.com" <sg16-avd(a)lists.packetizer.com>; "Q5/16" <t13sg16q5(a)lists.itu.int> Sent: 11/6/2014 6:46:50 PM Subject: RE: [T16Q5] Output meeting documents posted >TD-24 status = withdrawn. > > > >From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@packetizer.com] >Sent: Donnerstag, 6. November 2014 23:21 >To:sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com; Q5/16 >Subject: [T16Q5] Output meeting documents posted > > > >Q3 and Q5 Experts, > > > >All output documents received for the meeting have been posted to the >meeting directory on the AVC site. However, I could not find TD-16 or >TD-24, so those are not presently posted. Please let me know if those >are coming or if they should be marked as withdrawn. > > > >Thanks, > >Paul > > >

1 0

Output meeting documents posted
by Paul E. Jones 06 Nov '14

06 Nov '14

Q3 and Q5 Experts, All output documents received for the meeting have been posted to the meeting directory on the AVC site. However, I could not find TD-16 or TD-24, so those are not presently posted. Please let me know if those are coming or if they should be marked as withdrawn. Thanks, Paul

2 1

Liaison Draft
by Botzko, Stephen 06 Nov '14

06 Nov '14

Here's a draft liaison statement to SG12 for your review. Stephen Botzko (Paul - not for posting yet)

2 1

Draft report of Q5/16 Rapporteur meeting
by Botzko, Stephen 06 Nov '14

06 Nov '14

This is provided for your review. Stephen Botzko (Paul - this is not for posting yet)

1 0

FW: H.TPS-AV output draft
by Botzko, Stephen 06 Nov '14

06 Nov '14

I'm forwarding this to the packetizer list because my subscription to the Q5 mailing list seems to be malfunctioning. Stephen B. From: Botzko, Stephen Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 2:37 PM To: t13sg16q5(a)lists.itu.int Subject: H.TPS-AV output draft Here's the output draft from the Seoul Meeting (for review) Stephen Botzko

1 0