Re: [sg16-avd] The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Liang, et al,
For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages?
For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future.
In U.2: * "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association" * there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint" * In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of the paragraph * In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for consistency with the rest of H.245 * change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP”, once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read. * I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4. That said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better.
Thanks! Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int; t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com; "Botzko, Stephen" Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi every experts,
This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me.
BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? I missed that, thx.
It should be at the end of the choice. That is consistent with the audio and video usage.
Stephen
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Paul E. Jones paulej@packetizer.com wrote:
Liang, et al,
For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages?
For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future.
In U.2:
- "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association"
- there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint"
- In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of the
paragraph
- In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for
consistency with the rest of H.245
- change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP”,
once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read.
- I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4. That
said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better.
Thanks! Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int; t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com; "Botzko, Stephen" < Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi every experts,
This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me.
BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
Hi all,
I changed all the points listed below. Please check again.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
"Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com 2015/02/14 19:46 请答复 给 "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com
收件人 wang.liang12@zte.com.cn, t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int, t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int, sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com 抄送 "Botzko, Stephen" Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com 主题 [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Liang, et al,
For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages?
For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future.
In U.2: * "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association" * there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint" * In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of the paragraph * In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for consistency with the rest of H.245 * change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” , once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read. * I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4. That said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better.
Thanks! Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int; t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com; "Botzko, Stephen" < Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi every experts,
This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me.
BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
Liang,
"DTLSSecurityCapability" is a new SEQUENCE defined, but it should have an extension marker at the end for extensibility.
Sorry I missed that on the first review.
Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com; "Botzko, Stephen" Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com Cc: sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com; t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int Sent: 2/15/2015 11:51:04 AM Subject: 答复: [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi all,
I changed all the points listed below. Please check again.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
"Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com 2015/02/14 19:46
请答复 给 "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com
收件人 wang.liang12@zte.com.cn, t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int, t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int, sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com 抄送 "Botzko, Stephen" Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com 主题 [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Liang, et al,
For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages?
For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future.
In U.2:
- "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association"
- there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint"
- In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of the
paragraph
- In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for
consistency with the rest of H.245
- change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates
“DCEP”, once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read.
- I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4. That
said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better.
Thanks! Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int; t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" paulej@packetizer.com; "Botzko, Stephen" Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi every experts,
This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me.
BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
Hello Liang and Paul,
Comments: DTLSSecurityCapability (in 3 places): Can we delete the editor's note under these? This was a contributors note from C.721. It wasn't meant to be an editor's note.
Clause B.2.2.3: Change "...by ITU-T H.235.DTLS [121]."
Clause B.2.3: Change ".... ITU-T H.235.DTLS [121] provides further information on the use of this field. ..."
Regards, Christian
On 16/02/2015 7:34 AM, Paul E. Jones wrote:
Liang, "DTLSSecurityCapability" is a new SEQUENCE defined, but it should have an extension marker at the end for extensibility. Sorry I missed that on the first review. Paul ------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn mailto:wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>; "Botzko, Stephen" <Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com mailto:Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> Cc: sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com mailto:sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com; t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int mailto:t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int Sent: 2/15/2015 11:51:04 AM Subject: 答复: [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi all,
I changed all the points listed below. Please check again.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
*"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>*
2015/02/14 19:46
请答复 给 "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>
收件人 wang.liang12@zte.com.cn mailto:wang.liang12@zte.com.cn, t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int mailto:t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int, t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int mailto:t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int, sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com mailto:sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com 抄送 "Botzko, Stephen" <Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com mailto:Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> 主题 [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Liang, et al,
For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages?
For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future.
In U.2:
- "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association"
- there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint"
- In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of
the paragraph
- In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for
consistency with the rest of H.245
- change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates
“DCEP”, once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read.
- I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4.
That said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better.
Thanks! Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: _wang.liang12@zte.com.cn_ mailto:wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: _t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int_ mailto:t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int; _t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int_ mailto:t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <_paulej@packetizer.com_ mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>; "Botzko, Stephen" <_Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com_ mailto:Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi every experts,
This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me.
BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
Hi there,
all changed :-) thank you.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
Christian Groves Christian.Groves@nteczone.com 发件人: "sg16-avd" sg16-avd-bounces@lists.packetizer.com 2015/02/16 19:28
收件人 sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com 抄送
主题 Re: [sg16-avd] 答复: [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hello Liang and Paul,
Comments: DTLSSecurityCapability (in 3 places): Can we delete the editor's note under these? This was a contributors note from C.721. It wasn't meant to be an editor's note.
Clause B.2.2.3: Change "...by ITU-T H.235.DTLS [121]."
Clause B.2.3: Change ".... ITU-T H.235.DTLS [121] provides further information on the use of this field. ..."
Regards, Christian
On 16/02/2015 7:34 AM, Paul E. Jones wrote:
Liang, "DTLSSecurityCapability" is a new SEQUENCE defined, but it should have an extension marker at the end for extensibility. Sorry I missed that on the first review. Paul ------ Original Message ------ From: wang.liang12@zte.com.cn mailto:wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>; "Botzko, Stephen" <Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com mailto:Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> Cc: sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com mailto:sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com; t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int mailto:t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int Sent: 2/15/2015 11:51:04 AM Subject: 答复: [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi all,
I changed all the points listed below. Please check again.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
*"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com <mailto:paulej@packetizer.com
2015/02/14 19:46
请答复 给 "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>
收件人 wang.liang12@zte.com.cn mailto:wang.liang12@zte.com.cn,
t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int mailto:t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int, t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int mailto:t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int, sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com mailto:sg16-avd@lists.packetizer.com 抄送 "Botzko, Stephen" <Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com mailto:Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> 主题 [T16Q5] Re: The first version of H.245 output text. It's
too large
for me to send. I zip it.
Liang, et al,
For "DataProtocolCapability", I noted the "extendedDataCapability" was added at the end of "DataProtocolCapability". However, to advertise or use a "DataApplicationCapability", the "application" choice must be selected. Should the "extendedDataCapability" be added to the "application" choice? Or was it really intended to be at the end of the structure. If the latter, then what would be the "application" choice for most "extendedDataCapability" usages?
For the "DataChannel" SEQUENCE, please add an extension marker after "dataChannelProfile" in case new elements are added in the future.
In U.2:
- "a SCTP association" should be "an SCTP association"
- there is an extra space between the words "The endpoint"
- In the second paragraph, there is an extra space at the start of
the paragraph
- In U.3, change "/[ITU-T H.235.DTLS]" to be "/H.235.DTLS [121]" for
consistency with the rest of H.245
- change "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates
“DCEP”, once the..." to "If the establishmentType for the data channel indicates “DCEP” and once the ..." The reason is that there is another comma following almost immediately, so it makes the sentence more difficult to read.
- I would suggest a similar change to the first sentence in U.4.
That said, that sentence has a lot of "and"s in it. I'm not sure which reads better.
Thanks! Paul
------ Original Message ------ From: _wang.liang12@zte.com.cn_ mailto:wang.liang12@zte.com.cn To: _t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int_ mailto:t13sg16q5@lists.itu.int; _t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int_ mailto:t13sg16q2@lists.itu.int Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <_paulej@packetizer.com_ mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>; "Botzko, Stephen" <_Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com_ mailto:Stephen.Botzko@polycom.com> Sent: 2/14/2015 3:43:54 AM Subject: The first version of H.245 output text. It's too large for me to send. I zip it.
Hi every experts,
This is the first version of H.245 output text. It incluedes C.721, C.722, C.723, C.724 and C.828R1. Please have a look. Any suggestion please tell me.
BTW: my fight is on Tuesday afternoon next week. so I cann't attend the Q2's session in that afternoon. Sorry.
Thank you and Best regards, Liang Wang
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail
(and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
-------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
participants (4)
-
Christian Groves -
Paul E. Jones -
Stephen Botzko -
wang.liang12＠zte.com.cn