- sg16-avd - lists.packetizer.com

[itu-sg16] Meeting result on July 7
by 谷川　和法 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

------- 以下は転送メッセージ ------- Subject: Meeting result on July 7 From: Kazunori TANIKAWA <kazu(a)q04.itscom.net> Date: 07/08 00:16 Dear Q13/16 Chairs and Experts, This is a report of e-meeting on July 7, 2010. Moderator: K.Tanikawa (on behalf of Mr.Kawamori) Attendee: Teck Kiong Lee, Raf?(India delegate), Simao Campos, Kazunori Tanikawa Contributions: - HTSP.IPTV-ISPF: Editorial modifications (Singapore) Proposal was accepted. Editors hope to complete and have approval this document at SG16 plenary on July 30. - H.770 Amd.2: Oppen Issues (NEC) Main proposers of TR-069 items, both Brazil and Huawei, were absent from the e-meeting; therefore, just review remaining issues of H.770. It is necessary to consult with them during next IPTV-GSI. - H.IPTV-CONF.7: Updated document (NEC) Review new modifications and additions to H.CONF.7. Proposal is accepted. - H.IPTV-CONF.6: H.762 conformance sample test for the New Draft Recommendation H.IPTV-CONF.6(NTT) Contributor has not made in time; therefore, moderator presented briefly. There seemed to be no objection; however, it is good thing to present this contribution at next Q13/16 rappoture meeting. -- ------- ここまでが転送メッセージ -------

1 0

[itu-sg16] Regular Q13/16 Electronic-meeting contribution
by Masahito Kawamori 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

Dear Experts of Q13/16 Here is a contribution from Huawei. Best regards Kawamori

2 3

[itu-sg16] Update of NID draft recommendations
by Yoshinori Goto 06 Jul '10

06 Jul '10

Dear Q21 and 22 experts, At the Shanghai meeting, March 2010, we agreed to update the draft text of H.IDscheme and H.IRP in such a way that two recommendations adopt ucode and DNS based protocol. Based on this agreement, the editors are requested to prepare updated draft text and distribute them on the e-mail reflector. Considering that two draft recommendations are planned to be consented at the next SG16 meeting (July 2010) and that the degree of change on two drafts will be significant, earlier distribution of updated draft for review of other experts is a critical procedure for these documents. So, I would like to ask the editors of H.IDscheme and H.IRP, Mr. Lee and Prof. Koshizuka, to distribute the update draft as soon as possible and collect comments from other experts, particularly Mr. Olivier. Best regards, -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Yoshinori Goto NTT Access Network Service Systems Labs. TEL:+81 46 859 2241 FAX:+81 46 859 5513 e-mail:goto.yoshinori@lab.ntt.co.jp <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2 1

[itu-sg16] Q13/16 E-meeting: HSTP.IPTV-ISPF (IPTV Service Platform) doc
by Teck Kiong 05 Jul '10

05 Jul '10

Hi, Attached is the updated HSTP.IPTV-ISPF (IPTV Service Platform) draft technical paper for discussion in the ITU-SG16 Q13/16 e-Meeting this Wednesday 16 June 2010. Thank you. Regards, Teck Kiong LEE **** Institute for Infocomm Research, A*Star, Singapore Institute for Infocomm Research disclaimer: "This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you."

2 2

[itu-sg16] SVC Adhoc Group
by stephen botzko 01 Jul '10

01 Jul '10

As the chair of the Q1 SVC Adhoc Group, I have meet informally with several folks, including Vidyo and Tandberg. Since the IETF SVC draft is now moving into the RFC editor's queue, it is an appropriate time to start working on ITU-T signaling. There is general consensus that H.32x systems should support the SST mode of SVC that is specified in the current IETF draft. Although Radvision suggested last year that the MST mode also would be required, there seems to be little support for that requirement. The MST mode is intended for multicast, and is considerably more complex than SST. There is language in H.323 (Annex B) on the use of layered codecs. This text seems more applicable to MST than SST, since SST is sent as a single RTP session. Some normative statements (for instance the way timestamps of the various layers are coordinated) appears to be incompatible with the IETF SVC draft. We also note that there is an analogous RFC in the IETF which also defines the use of layered codecs. This signaling was not employed in the SVC draft. Athough the Annex B text should be reviewed more carefully, there is general consensus that simple interworking through H.32x<->SIP gateways and in multi-protocol conference bridges is more important than continuing the use of the existing Annex B procedures. There is also general consensus that attempting to precisely define the various combinations of layers that a receiver is capable of receiving is very complex, and should not be attempted in the signaling.Polycom at least sees the value in being able to actively negotiate which layers are being sent, in a way that is compatible with the current IETF draft. As chair, I believe that most others also support this view. Certainly no one has objected to including this capability. One way this could be accomplished in H.241, is to combine a simple SVC profile capability with a layer negotiation procedure that would be analogous to the set submode procedures. Please do respond (either to this list or to me personally) on this topic, especially if you have a different view on the topics above, or if you see additional requirements that are not included. I am not planning to hold an audio conference call at this time, but if people see a need for this I will schedule one. Stephen Botzko Polycom

2 1

[itu-sg16] Contributions to the next Q13/16 meeting
by Masahito Kawamori 30 Jun '10

30 Jun '10

Dear Q13/16 Colleagues, Just a reminder that for the upcoming meeting of Q13/16 (Geneva, 19-23 July 2010 for IPTV-GSI, during SG16 meeting, which will continue on until 30 July.), the deadline for contributions is 12 calendar days before the start of the meeting – in this case 6 July 2010. If you intend to write a contribution, please make sure that you send it to the TSB before this date. Best regards Masahito Kawamori Marcelo Moreno

1 0

Re: [itu-sg16] Regular Q13/16 Electronic-meeting details 30/6/2010
by Masahito Kawamori 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Dear experts of Q13/16 This is a gentle reminder to you that we will have our regular electronic meeting tomorrow. Please refer to the details posted last week. Looking forward to meeting you all, M.Kawamori > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Masahito Kawamori <kawamorim(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear experts of Q13/16 >> >> As we announced before, we would like to resume our regular electronic >> meeting on IOT and Conformance issues and others, starting from next >> Wednesday (16th June,2010). If you have contributions, please share >> them with us by 14 June, (Monday next week). >> >> Here are the details of the audio bridge and gotomeeting details for >> the weekly Q13/16 >> electronic meeting (they remain unchanged for the 4 planned meetings) >> >> Every Wednesday, 14:00-16:00 (Geneva time), 16, 23, 30 June + 7 July >> 2010 >> >> World time [16 June; time differences should be the same for the other >> three days]: >> http://timeanddate.com/s/1rh0 >> >> Gotomeeting: >> >> https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/547462017 >> >> Meeting Password: sg16q13 >> Meeting ID: 547-462-017 >> >> Audio bridge: >> >> Tel number: +41 22 730 5384 >> Pin code: 5632 >> >> >> Thank you, and looking forward to talking to you next week. >> >> Best regards >> >> Masahito Kawamori >> Marcelo Moreno >> >

1 0

[itu-sg16] Contributions to electronic meeting
by Masahito Kawamori 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Dear Experts of Q13/16 Please find attached our contribution on H.IPTV-CONF.6. Best regards Kawamori

1 0

[itu-sg16] Contributions to H.770 & Conformity test
by k-tanikawa＠cq.jp.nec.com 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Dear Q13/16 Chairs and Experts, Attached include following documents for e-meeting on June 30: - Updated H.IPTV-CONF.7 according to the result of previous e-meeting - H.770 Amd.2: A proposed addition of service provider identifier ------------------------------------ Kazunori TANIKAWA Carrier Network Business Unit NEC Corporation tel:+81-3-3798-2924 (ex.10-30670)

2 1

[itu-sg16] Regular Q13/16 Electronic-meeting details
by Masahito Kawamori 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

Dear experts of Q13/16 As we announced before, we would like to resume our regular electronic meeting on IOT and Conformance issues and others, starting from next Wednesday (16th June,2010). If you have contributions, please share them with us by 14 June, (Monday next week). Here are the details of the audio bridge and gotomeeting details for the weekly Q13/16 electronic meeting (they remain unchanged for the 4 planned meetings) Every Wednesday, 14:00-16:00 (Geneva time), 16, 23, 30 June + 7 July 2010 World time [16 June; time differences should be the same for the other three days]: http://timeanddate.com/s/1rh0 Gotomeeting: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/547462017 Meeting Password: sg16q13 Meeting ID: 547-462-017 Audio bridge: Tel number: +41 22 730 5384 Pin code: 5632 Thank you, and looking forward to talking to you next week. Best regards Masahito Kawamori Marcelo Moreno

2 4