- sg16-avd - lists.packetizer.com

Re: editor's copy of H.248.1
by OKUBO Sakae 23 Jul '02

23 Jul '02

Dear Mr. Anderson, At 15:00 -0400 02/07/23, Terry L Anderson wrote: >I cannot find a copy of pl-036r1, the editor's copy of H.248 Corregendum 1 >(that later became H.248.1) on the 0202_Gen site. I have uploaded a copy >to Incoming as > pl-036r1_h248_1.zip >Could you please arrange to have it moved to the 0202_Gen directory? It has been moved as requested. The index file 0202_Gen.html will be updated accordingly (currently I cannot access the server via ftp, though http is ok). Best regards, OKUBO Sakae e-mail: okubo(a)giti.waseda.ac.jp ****************************************************************** YRP Office Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI) Waseda University YRP Ichibankan 312 Tel: +81 468 47 5406 3-4 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagwa-ken Fax: +81 468 47 5413 239-0847 Japan Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI) Waseda University 29-7 Waseda University Bldg. Tel: +81 3 3204 8194 1-3-10 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Fax: +81 3 5286 3832 169-0051 Japan ******************************************************************

1 0

remove
by M. Sorbas 13 Jul '02

13 Jul '02

1 0

FW: Update notification from the ITU Web site for simao.campos@it u.int
by Campos, Simao 10 Jul '02

10 Jul '02

Dear colleagues, Two circulars that affect the SG16 work have been published: the schedule of meetings for next year and the anouncement of a workshop in December on Satellite in IP and Multimedia. Please see below. Best regards, Simao -----Original Message----- From: ITU Web Notification system [mailto:websupport@itu.int] Sent: 10 July 2002 03:04 To: simao.campos(a)itu.int Subject: Update notification from the ITU Web site for simao.campos(a)itu.int UPDATE NOTIFICATION for simao.campos(a)itu.int The following files have been updated since 2002-07-09 System : itudoc Group : itu-t updated : 2002-07-09 14:48:59 title : [117] Schedule of ITU-T meetings for 2003 url : http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/circ/01-04_1/117.html ------------------------------------------------------------- System : itudoc Group : itu-t updated : 2002-07-09 14:29:05 title : [110] Workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia, Geneva, 9 - 11 December 2002 url : http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/circ/01-04_1/110.html ------------------------------------------------------------- Note : you are receiving this e-mail because you have subscribed to the ITU notification system for new documents. If you want to change or cancel your notification e-mails , please proceed as follows : 1) log on from http://www.itu.int/tiesutils/asp/login.asp 2) from the Account Option, select Update Notification 3) select/unselect areas for which you want to be notified for new updates For further help, please contact TIES Helpdesk Service at helpdesk(a)itu.int or go to http://www.itu.int/TIES/ for documentation. Thank you

1 0

Re: IM and T.140
by Eli Orr 03 Jul '02

03 Jul '02

SIP/SIMPLE is most likely to be the most popular. MS selected it and it re-uses of existing infrastructure (proxies etc.). There are standards and there are standards de facto. Where JABBER fits in? >From practical indistry point of view H.323 UNI solution (e.g. based GEF.3 well defined) will enable H.323 Terminal developers to I/F with SIMPLE based solution. >From user point of view (He decides the future of this): Great multimedia and conferencing solutions (H.323) powered available IM/presence services. -----Original Message----- From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:taylor@NORTELNETWORKS.COM] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:22 AM To: ITU-SG16(a)echo.jf.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: IM and T.140 "Instant messaging" in general is a really crowded field of endeavour. The IETF had nine different protocol proposals in fromt of it. After a heroic effort these reduced to three. Now JABBER is attempting to expand the field again. The IETF has defined a framework for presence and instant messaging to make it easier for all of them to interwork. I suppose at some point we should look at how T.140 might be brought into line with this framework. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Long [mailto:plong@IPDIALOG.COM] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:29 PM To: ITU-SG16(a)echo.jf.INTEL.COM Subject: IM and T.140 What's the difference between "instant messaging" in general and T.140? IOW, what can you do with one that you can't do with the other? Paul Long ipDialog, Inc.

1 0

remove
by Liu, Gary 02 Jul '02

02 Jul '02

remove

1 0

remove
by Gregory 01 Jul '02

01 Jul '02

remove

1 0

Re: H.323v4 references H.235v1?
by Euchner Martin ICN M SR 3 01 Jul '02

01 Jul '02

According to my memories, H.235v2 was approved in 2000 in parallel to H.323v4. Thus, H.323 shall only use the newer reference of course, and everything else should be considered an error, that has to be corrected. With kind regards Martin Euchner. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | Dipl.-Inf. Rapporteur Q.G/SG16 | Martin Euchner Phone: +49 89 722 55790 | Siemens AG.....................Fax : +49 89 722 47713 | ICN M SR 3 mailto:Martin.Euchner@icn.siemens.de | mailto:martin.euchner@ties.itu.int | Hofmannstr. 51 Intranet: http://intranet.icn.siemens.de/marketing/cs27/topics/security/ | D-81359 Muenchen Internet: http://www.siemens.de/ | __________________ | Germany ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Paul Long [mailto:plong@IPDIALOG.COM] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:43 PM To: ITU-SG16(a)echo.jf.INTEL.COM Subject: H.323v4 references H.235v1? I just noticed that H.323v4 references H.235v1 (1998) rather than H.235v2 (2000). Is this correct/intentional? I'm not sure about the chronology, so maybe H.235v2 wasn't available when H.323v4 was Decided. Paul Long ipDialog, Inc.

1 0

Outcome of the Bruges meeting
by OKUBO Sakae 01 Jul '02

01 Jul '02

Dear SG16 experts, I have uploaded all AVD-numbered documents and TDs for the last week meeting in Bruges to the /0206_Bru directory. Its index page is http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/avc-site/0206_Bru/0206_Bru.html Please note the following TDs constitute the meeting report: Q.G http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/avc-site/0206_Bru/TD-12.zip Q.2 http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/avc-site/0206_Bru/TD-13a.zip Q.3 http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/avc-site/0206_Bru/TD-14a.zip Q.4 http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/avc-site/0206_Bru/TD-15.zip Best regards, OKUBO Sakae e-mail: okubo(a)giti.waseda.ac.jp ****************************************************************** YRP Office Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI) Waseda University YRP Ichibankan 312 Tel: +81 468 47 5406 3-4 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagwa-ken Fax: +81 468 47 5413 239-0847 Japan Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI) Waseda University 29-7 Waseda University Bldg. Tel: +81 3 3204 8194 1-3-10 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo Fax: +81 3 5286 3832 169-0051 Japan ******************************************************************

1 0

Re: IM and T.140
by Tom-PT Taylor 25 Jun '02

25 Jun '02

"Instant messaging" in general is a really crowded field of endeavour. The IETF had nine different protocol proposals in fromt of it. After a heroic effort these reduced to three. Now JABBER is attempting to expand the field again. The IETF has defined a framework for presence and instant messaging to make it easier for all of them to interwork. I suppose at some point we should look at how T.140 might be brought into line with this framework. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Long [mailto:plong@IPDIALOG.COM] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:29 PM To: ITU-SG16(a)echo.jf.INTEL.COM Subject: IM and T.140 What's the difference between "instant messaging" in general and T.140? IOW, what can you do with one that you can't do with the other? Paul Long ipDialog, Inc.

1 0

Re: H.323v4 references H.235v1?
by Campos, Simao 25 Jun '02

25 Jun '02

Paul, H.323 from the ITU web site has in its reference section: "... [22] ITU-T Recommendation H.235 (2000), Security and encryption for H-series (H.323 and other H.245-based) multimedia terminals. ..." Please make sure that you use the official version from the ITU (http://www.itu.int/rec/recommendation.asp?type=folders&lang=e&parent=T-REC- H.323) rather than the unofficial version off the PictureTel site or else. ESPECIALLY as recommendations are progressed into new versions... :-) Best regards, Simao Campos-Neto > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Long [mailto:plong@IPDIALOG.COM] > Sent: 24 June 2002 21:43 > To: ITU-SG16(a)echo.jf.INTEL.COM > Subject: H.323v4 references H.235v1? > > > I just noticed that H.323v4 references H.235v1 (1998) rather > than H.235v2 > (2000). Is this correct/intentional? I'm not sure about the > chronology, so > maybe H.235v2 wasn't available when H.323v4 was Decided. > > Paul Long > ipDialog, Inc. >

1 0