At the interop, I sent an ARQ to a GK with an unregistered alias on purpose.
The GK scanned its database, couldn't find it, and then queried another GK. I
tried this maybe three times, and found that it took around 20 seconds for
"my" GK to respond with its ARJ. The recommended time out and retry count is 3
seconds and 2 times, respectively, for an ARQ (7.19/H.225.0v2). This adds up
to a maximum recommended time out of 9 seconds. The person testing the GK
thought that it should be longer due to …
[View More]the fact that a GK may have to query
another GK before responding. The GK-GK query should always be one-deep,
regardless of whether it uni- or multicast the LRQ, so the time-to-reply is
not indeterminate.
Should we increase the recommended total wait for an ARQ to around 30 seconds,
such as a time out and retry of 10/2 or 5/5?
I know that a GK can use RIP with a v2 EP to increase the timeout, but
increasing the recommended values would work with all EPs. Any thoughts?
Paul Long
Smith Micro Software, Inc.
[View Less]
Attached you'll find a document explaining how multimedia contexts could
work. The document is still evolving (see notes on the last page), but
I thought I'd better get it out in time for people to be able to look at
it before tomorrow's conference call.
Regards,
John Segers
--
John Segers email: jsegers(a)lucent.com
Lucent Technologies Room HE 344
Dept. Forward Looking Work phone: +31 35 687 4724
P.…
[View More]O. Box 18, 1270 AA Huizen fax: +31 35 687 5954
[View Less]
Tom,
The H.245 allows the association of specific streams for lip synch
between audio and video. The general case that you specify is to know
which streams belong to one call so that you can treat them as one
entity. The MGC must know both relations to control the call.
Roni Even
**********************************************
Roni Even
VP Product Marketing
Accord Video Telecommunication
Email: roni_e(a)accord.co.il
Tel: +972-3-9251412
Fax: +972-3-9211571
****************************************…
[View More]***********
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom-PT Taylor [SMTP:taylor@NORTELNETWORKS.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 1999 6:38 PM
> To: ITU-SG16(a)MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Synchronization Of Streams
>
> This is a question which affects the design of the Media gateway
> control
> protocol. What information must be passed to the MG so it knows which
> media
> streams have to be synchronized? Is it sufficient that the MG knows
> which
> streams are flowing over the same user connection, or does the
> relationship
> have to be specified on a per-stream basis. I know that H.245 allows
> the
> latter, but I am considering the possibility of a Termination in a
> multimedia context, which binds together multiple H.245 Logical
> Channels.
> Under that circumstance, can the MG use rules to know that, for
> instance,
> audio and video are synchronized but data flows independently?
>
> Tom Taylor
> E-mail: taylor(a)nortelnetworks.com (internally Tom-PT Taylor)
> Tel.: +1 613 736 0961 (ESN 396-1490)
> FAX: same number by prior arrangement (manual answer).
[View Less]