Re: Proposed Change to ITU-SG16 Mail List Procedures

For the reasons Dr. Okubo cited, Martin's two-stage procedure is probably better for the purpose. I've administered the Megaco list on three systems now: majordomo, listserv, and mailman. Of them all, only mailman allows me to specify spam filters, to a limited extent. I have to be extremely careful, because IETF rules really do not permit any hint of moderation of true list discussion. However, it's amazing how effective a simple rule like: "Hold messages without a specific addressee" can be. -----Original Message----- From: Folts, Harold [mailto:foltsh@NCS.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:47 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: Proposed Change to ITU-SG16 Mail List Procedures Greetings, There is also another way to limit posting to the list that does not involve the two-step process. The list can be limited so that only those registered for the list can post to it. I know that is a feature of majordomo that I use for some of my lists. Hal
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
participants (1)
-
Tom-PT Taylor