Yes, I have mentioned this a few times in the meetings.

Somebody should bring a precise proposal to change the names from ATM Forum centric terminology to ITU-T terminology (SBR, etc.).

The problem is finding an ATM-minded person who cares enought to actually write the contribution...

----- François Audet  Tel:+1 408 565 5675 mailto:audet@NortelNetworks.com Nortel Networks Fax:+1 408 565 2375 http://www.NortelNetworks.com

-----Original Message----- From: Srini Beereddy [mailto:srini@TRILLIUM.COM] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 10:40 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: ATMParameters in H.245

Hi,

There is a editorial comment about ATM Parameters in all the versions of H.245 (I checked in V3, V5 and V6). I guess these parameters need to be aligned with I.371 and the never been done so far. Can anyone throw some light on this.

-- Ed. Replace with ITU-T ATM Transfer Capability Types ATMParameters ::=SEQUENCE { maxNTUSize INTEGER(0..65535), --units in octets atmUBR BOOLEAN, --unspecified bit rate atmrtVBR BOOLEAN, --real time variable bit rate atmnrtVBR BOOLEAN, --non real time variable bit rate atmABR BOOLEAN, --available bit rate atmCBR BOOLEAN, --constant bit rate ... }

thanks, Srini, Trillium Digital Systems, Inc.