Yes, I have mentioned this a few times in the meetings.

Somebody should bring a precise proposal to change the names from
ATM Forum centric terminology to ITU-T terminology (SBR, etc.).

The problem is finding an ATM-minded person who cares enought to
actually write the contribution...

-----
François Audet  Tel:+1 408 565 5675 mailto:audet@NortelNetworks.com
Nortel Networks Fax:+1 408 565 2375 http://www.NortelNetworks.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srini Beereddy [mailto:srini@TRILLIUM.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 10:40 AM
> To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: ATMParameters in H.245
>
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a editorial comment about ATM Parameters in all the
> versions of
> H.245 (I checked in V3, V5 and V6). I guess these parameters
> need to be
> aligned with I.371 and the never been done so far. Can anyone
> throw some
> light on this.
>
> -- Ed. Replace with ITU-T ATM Transfer Capability Types
> ATMParameters   ::=SEQUENCE
> {
>         maxNTUSize      INTEGER(0..65535),        --units in octets
>         atmUBR  BOOLEAN,                       --unspecified bit rate
>         atmrtVBR        BOOLEAN,                       --real
> time variable
> bit rate
>         atmnrtVBR       BOOLEAN,                       --non real time
> variable bit rate
>         atmABR  BOOLEAN,                       --available bit rate
>         atmCBR  BOOLEAN,                       --constant bit rate
>         ...
> }
>
> thanks,
> Srini,
> Trillium Digital Systems, Inc.
>