Re: Final Revision of Changes for H.225.0v4 and H.323v4
Krish, I believe Pete may be the better person to answer this question. Essentially, if the Gatekeeper provides the needed feature-- that's great. If it does not, it needs to ensure that the LRQ contains the needed feature information so that the destination Gatekeeper can locate an entity that can provide the features. I believe this logic applies regardless of whether the call is routed or not. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sudharsana krishnan P" <pskrish@miel.mot.com> To: "'Paul E. Jones'" <paulej@PACKETIZER.COM>; "'H323implementors@Imtc.Org' (E-mail)" <h323implementors@imtc.org> Cc: <pskrish@miel.mot.com> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:36 PM Subject: RE: Final Revision of Changes for H.225.0v4 and H.323v4 provided by the Gatekeeper into the LRQ. In trying to determine whether the necessary set of features are supported, the Gatekeeper shall examine the supported features of the endpoint to which the ARQ may resolve, either locally or in response to an LCF, and the features supported by the Gatekeeper. provided by the Gatekeeper into the LRQ. In trying to determine whether the necessary set of features are supported, the Gatekeeper shall examine the supported features of the endpoint to which the ARQ may resolve, either locally or in response to an LCF, and the features supported by the Gatekeeper.
Case 2: Direct routed model should read.
If the responding entity is a Gatekeeper that sends an LRQ in response to
receiving an ARQ, the Gatekeeper SHALL copy any features EVEN IF NOT provided by the Gatekeeper into the LRQ. In trying to determine whether the necessary set of features are supported, the Gatekeeper shall examine the supported features of the endpoint to which the ARQ may resolve, either locally or in response to an LCF.
I
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
Hi Paul On second reading it is clear to me. My mail was worded incorrectly too. Thanks for the response. Regards krish -----Original Message----- From: owner-h323implementors@imtc.org [mailto:owner-h323implementors@imtc.org]On Behalf Of Paul E. Jones Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 11:49 AM To: pskrish@MIEL.MOT.COM; 'H323implementors@Imtc.Org' (E-mail) Cc: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com; Pete Cordell Subject: Re: Final Revision of Changes for H.225.0v4 and H.323v4 Krish, I believe Pete may be the better person to answer this question. Essentially, if the Gatekeeper provides the needed feature-- that's great. If it does not, it needs to ensure that the LRQ contains the needed feature information so that the destination Gatekeeper can locate an entity that can provide the features. I believe this logic applies regardless of whether the call is routed or not. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sudharsana krishnan P" <pskrish@miel.mot.com> To: "'Paul E. Jones'" <paulej@PACKETIZER.COM>; "'H323implementors@Imtc.Org' (E-mail)" <h323implementors@imtc.org> Cc: <pskrish@miel.mot.com> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:36 PM Subject: RE: Final Revision of Changes for H.225.0v4 and H.323v4 provided by the Gatekeeper into the LRQ. In trying to determine whether the necessary set of features are supported, the Gatekeeper shall examine the supported features of the endpoint to which the ARQ may resolve, either locally or in response to an LCF, and the features supported by the Gatekeeper. provided by the Gatekeeper into the LRQ. In trying to determine whether the necessary set of features are supported, the Gatekeeper shall examine the supported features of the endpoint to which the ARQ may resolve, either locally or in response to an LCF, and the features supported by the Gatekeeper.
Case 2: Direct routed model should read.
If the responding entity is a Gatekeeper that sends an LRQ in response to
receiving an ARQ, the Gatekeeper SHALL copy any features EVEN IF NOT provided by the Gatekeeper into the LRQ. In trying to determine whether the necessary set of features are supported, the Gatekeeper shall examine the supported features of the endpoint to which the ARQ may resolve, either locally or in response to an LCF.
I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Please send E-mail to contact@imtc.org <mailto:contact@imtc.org> to subscribe or unsubscribe from this list ------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Please send E-mail to contact@imtc.org <mailto:contact@imtc.org> to subscribe or unsubscribe from this list ------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Paul E. Jones
-
Sudharsana krishnan P