Paul,
yes. Reading through the definitions section of H.323 (again;-)), made me realize that it states
that the definitions from H.225.0 and H.245 also apply to the H.323 Recommendation. I suppose
that things are covered this way. Nevertheless, to improve readability, it wouldn't hurt to add
explicit references to definitions for things that are rather important.
Frank
paulej@packetizer.com on 28/01/2001 21:48:30
To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com@SMTP
Frank Derks/HVS/BE/PHILIPS@EMEA2
cc:
Subject: Re: Re: The meaning of "mode" in the H.323 Recommendation?
Classification:
Frank,
I trust that Mike's answer to "mode" addresses your concerns.
With respect to "H.225.0 logical channel signalling", yes.. that should be
H.245.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Derks" <frank.derks@PHILIPS.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: The meaning of "mode" in the H.323 Recommendation?
Paul,
the sections I was referring to are the following:
- 6.2.8.1, 5th paragraph: "The transmitting terminal assigns each
individual mode ..."
- 6.2.8.1, 6th paragraph: "... audio modes ..."
- 6.2.8.1, 7th paragraph: "... indicates a set of modes ..."
- 6.2.8.1, 1st paragraph after the notes: "... dependencies between
operating modes ...", "...different sets of modes ..."
- 6.2.8.2, 3rd paragraph: "... certain symmetrical modes ...", " ...
using a particular mode ..."
Undoubtedly it appears in more places.
Something else that struck as strange, was section 6.2.8.6. It mentions
H.225.0 logical signalling procedures and
H.225.0 logical channels. I would assume that these should read "H.245".
Frank
paulej@PACKETIZER.COM@SMTP@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM on 26-01-2001 11:03:30
Please respond to paulej@PACKETIZER.COM@SMTP
Sent by: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM@SMTP
cc:
Subject: Re: The meaning of "mode" in the H.323 Recommendation?
Classification:
Frank,
I would need to look at the particular section of text or sections :-),
but
I if it isn't clear, I'd agree that it should be clarified.
Unfortunately,
it's too late to get such text into H.323 version 4.
If it is a short list of sections, post them here and I suspect folks will
be able to get an answer to you before I get back into the office (I'm
currently on the road). If the list is lengthy, just send it to me and
I'll
look at the sections when I get a chance. Do you think this is something
that needs clarification in the implementers guide or something to try to
get into v5?
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Derks" <frank.derks@PHILIPS.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 7:33 AM
Subject: The meaning of "mode" in the H.323 Recommendation?
Paul,
as I was reading through the latest draft of H.323v4, I came across
something that has
been in the recommendation for a long time, but that I never quite
grasped: "mode".
The recommendation talks about "mode" and there is a (H.245) message to
request
a terminal to use a certain "mode" (requestMode), but there is no
explanation of what
"mode" actually means. Shouldn't there be a definition of "mode" in the
Definitions
section?
Regards,
Frank
-----------------------------------------------------
Frank Derks |Tel +31 35 6893238 |
Advanced Development |Fax +31 35 6891030 |
Philips Business Communications|P.O. Box 32 |
|1200 JD Hilversum |
|The Netherlands |
----------------------------------------------------|
E-mail: mailto:frank.derks@philips.com |
WWW: http://www.sopho.philips.com |
-----------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@mailbag.intel.com
frank.derks＠philips.com