Morgan,
H.323 /p75: The change of name from 'package' to 'parameter' is inappropriate. If the name has to be changed from 'package', it should be changed to genericFeature.
I proposed this change, because the word "package" conflicted with H.248 "packages" and I thought that it was too confusing. GenericParameter seemed like a reasonable name. I don't like the idea of calling it a "generic feature", because the structures in themselves are not "features". One uses the "generic parameter" structures in order to implement "features".
How about "generic fields" or "generic elements"? I still prefer "generic parameter" over those.
Paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com