Hi All,
Is it a valid situation if a "Sequence Of" element is encoded with number of components as 0? PER rules dictate that the lower bound on the number of components is set to 0, if lower bound is not explicitly defined. Since
Manoj, It is legal, but one should not do this unless the protocol prescribes it. For example, in H.323 version 4, an empty list of alternate gatekeepers is used to signal to the endpoint that it should delete any list it may have previously received. Usage like this, which has a well-prescribed meaning, is useful. However, empty lists in places that make no sense will probably do nothing but create confusion. In any case, entities must be prepared to decode them. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul, Manoj" <mpaul@TRILLIUM.COM> To: <ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:30 PM Subject: PER ASN.1 encoding of Sequence Of Elements - Boundary Conditions the
minimum is 0, one can encode the "Sequence Of" element with 0 components.
What would it mean to encode a Sequence Of with no components encoded? In this case, though, there may be a few bits added to the field list for the length determinant of Sequence Of with value 0.
Thanks Manoj.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com