Ernst,
Yes, I did.. thanks for pointing that out.
Paul
----- Original Message ----- From: "Horvath Ernst" ernst.horvath@SIEMENS.AT To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 4:44 AM Subject: AW: Corrections to Mobile-UIM
Paul,
when changing GSM-UIM element tmsi you deleted the word OPTIONAL. This should be re-inserted because tmsi should certainly not become mandatory.
Regards, Ernst
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@ACM.ORG] Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 17. Jänner 2001 07:16 An: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Betreff: Corrections to Mobile-UIM
Folks,
In the past week or so, the specifications of the mobile number definitions-- particularly for GSM-UIM-- were discussed and changes were deemed necessary.
I have made changes as recommended by the Annex H and Annex E/H.246 editors.
Please find the attached document with the list of corrections for H.323v4 and H.225.0v4. In particular, the first GSM-UIM type in section 2.5 has been modified since the last time I e-mailed this draft.
Please review the changes and any other relevant ASN.1 changes.
Thanks, Paul
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com