One more question????
Dave,
Sorry, but I won't be in Monterey.
I agree with what you say, except that I would go further and state that there is always a one-to-one mapping between H.225.0 and H.245 protocolIdentifiers via H.323. For example,
H.225.0v1 => H.323v1 => H.245v2 and H.245v2 => H.323v1 => H.225.0v1 H.225.0v2 => H.323v2 => H.245v3 and H.245v3 => H.323v2 => H.225.0v2This is already implied by the Summary section of H.323 starting with version 2. I think it's clear, but you could add clarification text if you like. IOW, for example, an EP cannot use H.245v2 and H.225.0v2 in the same call.
But can H.225.0 V2 (H.323 V2) and H.245V4 (or 5) be used in the same call???
Gary
------------------------------------------------------ Name : Gary A. Thom Company: Delta Information Systems, Inc. Address: 300 Welsh Rd., Bldg 3 Horsham, PA 19044 USA Phone : +1-215-657-5270 Fax : +1-215-657-5273 E-mail : gthom@delta-info.com ------------------------------------------------------