17 Nov
2010
17 Nov
'10
2:16 p.m.
Ishikawa-san, I have some good news! I had an exchange with the conference center team and they have given us a room next to our meeting room for the afternoon of the 29th for a conference call. So, you will be able to have that call in parallel with the main meeting. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp] > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:58 AM > To: Noah Luo > Cc: 'Olivier Dubuisson'; 'Paul E. Jones'; itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com; > 'Խ�V ��' > Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ��: Extra room availability in the afternoon of > Nov 29th. > > Dear Mr. Noah Luo, > > Thank you for your post. > > It is indeed the case that the sessions for Q21, Q22, and Q25 are not > planned in the afternoon. > But we must find the space (and available time) for the informal > gathering. > That is another matter. > > I am trying now. > > Thank you for everyone's understanding, and I would like to thank Mr. > Luo for clearing the schedule for Q21, Q22 (and Q25 because some experts > need to attend it also) for our purpose. > > Sincerely, > Chiaki Ishikawa > > > On (11/17/2010 05:09 PM), Noah Luo wrote: > > Dear All > > > > It is not an exact description that I had freed the afternoon session > > for the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. > > > > Indeed,what I have done is to avoid arranging any Q21,22,25 session > > for Monday afternoon at Mr.Ishikawa's request. > > > > Monday afternoon, according to our current Agenda,is to be used for > > other Questions. > > Please have this clarification. > > > > Noah > > > > > > -----�ʼ�ԭ��----- > > ������: itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com > > [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces@lists.packetizer.com] ���� Olivier Dubuisson > > ����ʱ��: 2010��11��16�� 23:08 > > �ռ���: Paul E. Jones > > ����: 'Խ�V ��'; itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com > > ����: Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov > 29th. > > > > Paul, > > > > it is my understanding that Noah has freed the afternoon session for > > the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. I will let > > Chiaki-san confirm as he is the one who had the email exchange with > Noah. > > > > Olivier > > > > On 16/11/2010 16:03, Paul E. Jones wrote: > >> Ishikawa-san, > >> > >> It would be possible to use the meeting room during the lunch break > >> (12:40 > > - 14:00). Another option is to have the meeting at 08:00 (or > > earlier). I can be there early to help facilitate an early morning > > meeting, though I would prefer that we not have that early morning > > meeting on the very first day so that I can be free to help with > > logistical issues that might arise on the first day. > >> > >> However, 14:00 is the time for meetings to resume, so it would not be > > possible to use the room during that time unless Noah adjusts the > > schedule to allocate time specifically for this meeting. > >> > >> Paul > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa@ubin.jp] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:51 AM > >>> To: Paul E. Jones > >>> Cc: itu-sg16@lists.packetizer.com; stefano.polidori@itu.int; > >>> simao.campos@itu.int; Խ�V ��; Noah Luo�����ң�; ISHIKAWA Chiaki > >>> Subject: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov > >>> 29th. > >>> > >>> Dear Paul, > >>> > >>> Allow me to introduce myself. > >>> > >>> My name is Chiaki Ishikawa (SCAT) from Japan. > >>> > >>> I am going to attend the meeting at Cisco building later this month. > >>> > >>> Thank you for taking care of the meeting logistics and all that. > >>> > >>> Now, I have to ask you a favor. > >>> > >>> Some experts from Q.22, Q.21, and Q.25, as well as external experts > >>> from ISO and elsewhere, have been discussing an issue that needs to > >>> be resolved between ITU-T and ISO, and specifically JCA-NID meetings > >>> took place this year to address this issue. The earlier meeting > >>> could not resolve this, and so an liaison statement was sent from > >>> ITU-T SG16 to ISO SC 31 WG6. And an informal ad-hoc meeting and > >>> teleconferences of experts have been going on since August to > address this issue. > >>> > >>> We are close to some agreement about the technical direction (if I > >>> am not > >>> mistaken,) and also about the procedure (a formal response to the LS > >>> is in the waiting to be voted by ISO SC 31 WG6 the last time I > >>> heard.) > >>> > >>> Many participants of this ad-hoc meeting gather in Research Triangle > >>> to attend this SG16 WP2 rapporteur meeting and so we would like to > >>> hold a meeting for a couple of hours, at least, in the afternoon of > Nov. > >>> 29th to discuss this matter in an informal manner. > >>> Mr. Noah Luo was kind enough to clear the schedule of Q.21, Q.22, > >>> and > >>> Q.25 so that the experts involved in this issue can attend the > >>> meeting without worry. > >>> > >>> However, as it turned out, we have a room availability problem. > >>> Stefano obviously consulted with you earlier, and it was suggested > >>> that maybe we can use the main room for such a meeting in the > >>> afternoon. We may need a telcon facility if possible. WAN access is > >>> a must if we go the route of Skype for others who can't come and > still want to attend. > >>> > >>> Is the use of the "main room"(?) possible in the afternoon of Nov > 29th? > >>> (I hope to have a meeting from 14:00 so that we had enough time > >>> after lunch, and 14:00 is 20:00 in Paris where an important > >>> stakeholder or two can join by teleconference. We may be able to > >>> shift it by 30 minutes or so both > >>> ways.) > >>> > >>> We are an informal gathering and so if up-to seven or 8 (with > >>> additional chairs if necessary) people can sit around a table and > >>> chat informally, it might be OK. My point is that the room doesn't > >>> have to be very big. > >>> > >>> I hate to add another logistical request to yours, but I wonder if > >>> you can help us in this matter. > >>> > >>> Sincerely, > >>> Chiaki Ishikawa > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > >