Paul,
Agreed. I have changed the text accordingly.
Paul
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Long" plong@PACKETIZER.COM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 12:24 PM Subject: Re: Fast Connect & Bi Directional channels
Paul,
To be perfectly clear, I recommend inserting the text below into the new sentence you added to 8.1.7.2.
"The ***called*** endpoint shall use the proposed logical channel number
in
the forwardlogicalChannelNumber element as the logical channel number of
the
***forward and*** reverse channel."
Paul Long ipDialog, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@PACKETIZER.COM] Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 1:48 AM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: Fast Connect & Bi Directional channels
Sasha, et al.,
Sorry for the last e-mail on this subject. I had not seen this one, yet. So, it appears that you agree that for bi-directional channels we can use the forward LCN as the value of the reverse LCN. I have attached the most recent documents containing corrections to H.323v4 and H.225.0v4, which includes a proposal for this item.
Please review the text and give me comments.
Best Regards, Paul
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com