Paul,
I don't believe that this change was a fix to anything. Attendees saw an opportunity to start H.245 even earlier than was previously allowed and decided to propose it. It was merely a proposed improvement.
Paul
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Long" Plong@SMITHMICRO.COM To: ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 11:58 PM Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4
Paul,
Unfortunately, I wasn't in Osaka. Would it be asking too much to ask what problem this was supposed to fix? Maybe we can come up with a fix that
won't
break something else. That would be the ideal solution.
Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@PACKETIZER.COM] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 10:14 PM To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4
Paul,
We agreed at the Osaka meeting to allow a SETUP to contain both the fastStart and h245Control, but it has not been officially approved by the ITU.
As it stands right now, I don't think I can agree to include it in H.323v4 on the grounds that it breaks backward compatibility with V2-- I just don't see a clean solution here.
I'm opening to hearing more suggestions, but as you pointed out, there are two issues:
- H.323v2 states explicitly that it is illegal
- There is no way to know what version to destination EP is before sending this illegal message
Paul
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com