8 Dec
2000
8 Dec
'00
1:31 p.m.
Chris,
I agree that an endpoint shall not reject its gatekeeper's URQ. However, I disagree with you on the other part of this. If the gatekeeper sends a URQ containing no aliases this should be taken as complete unregistration.
I think we're in agreement. I was saying that if a Gatekeeper sends a URQ without any aliases, that means that the endpoint shall consider itself unregistered.
Here's what I wrote:
If a Gatekeeper sends a URQ with no aliases, that is already understood by all endpoints that the endpoint is no longer
registered
Are we in agreement or am I missing something?
Paul
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to listserv@mailbag.intel.com