<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=373012014-19102004>Venkata,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=373012014-19102004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=373012014-19102004>they
could be added as optional parameters to the existing defintions for AMR in
H.245 Annex I. AMR is defined as a generic capability, which is extensible. Just
make sure that the additional parameters use new identifiers. There should
also be some text describing the meaning and usage of the new parameters, and if
applicable, their relationship with existing
parameters.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=373012014-19102004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=373012014-19102004>This
would require sending a delayed contribution to the next SG16 meeting (note the
deadline - 4 November 2004 - and the procedural aspects - Paul Jones may be able
to advice you). If accepted, the changes could still be edited into the draft
for H.245 version 11.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=373012014-19102004></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=373012014-19102004>Ernst</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><SPAN class=373012014-19102004></SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT
size=2><SPAN class=373012014-19102004><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff> </FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=373012014-19102004> </SPAN>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
Venkata Nanduri [mailto:vnanduri@cisco.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Montag, 18. Oktober
2004 19:18<BR><B>To:</B> Horvath Ernst<BR><B>Cc:</B> paulej@cisco.com;
itu-sg16@external.cisco.com; vdukki@cisco.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
Clarification needed about AMR codec support<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">Hi,<BR><BR>If
that is the case, how those parameters can be negotiated using
H245?<BR><BR>Any information in this regard is highly
appreciated...<BR><BR>Similar parameters for SIP are defined in RFC3267,
Section 8.1.<BR><BR>Thanks<BR>Venkata<BR><BR>At 10:01 AM 10/18/2004 -0400,
Horvath Ernst wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite="" type="cite"><FONT face=arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Venkata,</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT face=arial color=#0000ff
size=2>D-284 was a contribution to the October-2002 meeting of SG16, but
Question 3/16 did not accept the proposed text because of conflicts with the
existing AMR definitions in H.245. The editor of D-284 was invited to bring
a revised proposal to the next meeting, which seemingly did not happen.
That's the reason why the parameters proposed in D-284 never became a part
of H.245.</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT face=arial color=#0000ff size=2>Hope
this solves your doubts.</FONT><BR> <BR><FONT face=arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Ernst</FONT>
<DL><FONT face=tahoma size=2>
<DD>-----Original Message-----
<DD>From:</B> Venkata Nanduri [<A href="mailto:vnanduri@cisco.com"
eudora="autourl">mailto:vnanduri@cisco.com</A>]
<DD>Sent:</B> Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2004 23:41
<DD>To:</B> itu-sg16@external.cisco.com
<DD>Cc:</B> paulej@cisco.com
<DD>Subject:</B> Clarification needed about AMR codec
support<BR><BR></FONT>
<DD>Hi,<BR><BR>
<DD>This email is regarding a clarification needed about a document
submitted to SG16(SG 16 - Delayed contribution 284).<BR><BR>
<DD>In the Document titled "Update on AMR speech codec support for H.245",
Table X.4 a parameter "octetAlign"
<DD>is mentioned. But the same is missing from the latest H245 formal
specification.<BR><BR>
<DD>As per the document(Delayed contribution 284), "octetAlign"
parameter can be used to specify
<DD>whether the bandwidth efficient</B> or Octet aligned</B> mode of
operation is used.<BR><BR>
<DD>Since, In the formal spec, this parameter is missing, how should we
negotiate whether
<DD>we want to use Bandwidth efficient</B> or Octet aligned
</B>operation.<BR><BR>
<DD>I also see other parameters(modeSet, ModeChangePeriod,
ModeChangeNeighbour, Crc, robustSorting and interleaving)
<DD>mentioned in your document, but are missing from the formal
spec.<BR><BR>
<DD>Any information about how to negotiate those parameters?<BR><BR>
<DD>Thanks
<DD>Venkata </DD></DL></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>