<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Folks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I just recently discovered that the ITU-T published a
corrigendum to T.38 (1998) that apparently breaks backward compatibility for all
T.38 devices currently deployed that follow the original 1998
specifications. The particular document in question is Corrigendum 1,
which was approved in 2000 and subsequently published in May 2001. You can
download the corrigendum document for free from this site:</FONT></DIV><FONT
face=Arial><A
href="http://www.itu.int/rec/recommendation.asp?type=folders&lang=e&parent=T-REC-T.38">http://www.itu.int/rec/recommendation.asp?type=folders&lang=e&parent=T-REC-T.38</A></FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>The issue at hand is a change in the ASN.1 syntax found in
Annex A/T.38. The particular data structure is shown here:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>Data-Field ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE<BR>{<BR>
field-type ENUMERATED<BR> {<BR> hdlc-data,<BR> hdlc-sig-end,<BR> hdlc-fcs-OK,<BR> hdlc-fcs-BAD,<BR> hdlc-fcs-OK-sig-end,<BR> hdlc-fcs-BAD-sig-end,<BR> t4-non-ecm-data,<BR> t4-non-ecm-sig-end<U><FONT
color=#ff0000>,</FONT></U><BR> <U><FONT
color=#ff0000>...</FONT></U><BR> },<BR> field-data OCTET
STRING (SIZE(1..65535)) OPTIONAL<BR>}</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial>The syntactical change was the addition of an
ellipsis at the end of the ENUMERATED "field-type". In the published 1998
specification, this ellipsis did not exist.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial>What I would like to know is whether this change
impacts your product or not. I am aware of many deployed devices on the
market today that employs the 1998 syntax without this ellipsis. I would
like to find out to what extent this change is going to present problems
for companies represented on various lists and, if I get
sufficient support, I want to take a contribution to the ITU-T SG16 meeting in
May to try to resolve this problem in such a way as to not break backward
compatibility and interoperability.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial>I am looking forward to your replies.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial>Kindest Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial>Paul E.
Jones</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv@lists.intel.com