<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<TITLE>FW: FW: [VoIP-list] FW: [Fwd: AVT WG last call on RTP spec and profil e]</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001><FONT face=Arial
color=#800000>Guys,</FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001><FONT face=Arial
color=#800000>This payload type = 4 for G.723.1 has been in H.225.0 for
many years. </FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#800000 size=2><SPAN
class=410255723-13032001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#800000 size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001>Don't
we have many interoperable H.323 products using PT=4 for
G.723?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001><FONT face=Arial
color=#800000>Won't it be a major interoperability problem if this payload
type</FONT> <FONT face=Arial color=#800000>is removed from the A/V
specification?????</FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#800000 size=2><SPAN
class=410255723-13032001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#800000 size=2><SPAN
class=410255723-13032001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN class=410255723-13032001> </SPAN>> -----Original
Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> From: Simao Campos-Neto [ <A
href="mailto:simao.campos@LABS.COMSAT.COM">mailto:simao.campos@LABS.COMSAT.COM</A></FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>> <<A
href="mailto:simao.campos@LABS.COMSAT.COM">mailto:simao.campos@LABS.COMSAT.COM</A>>
]</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 8:27 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>> To: ITU-SG16@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>> Subject: [Fwd: AVT WG last call on RTP spec and profile]</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>></FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>></FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>>
Dear colleagues,</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>></FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>>
please see in the attached that audio payload formats for G.723.1,</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>> called there "G723", has been removed from the latest RTP
A/V profile</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> because of the lack on information that
interoperable implementations of</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> them exist. Other
audio payload formats have also been removed, e.g.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>>
H263 (this is not the same as H263-2000), GSM-HR, GSM-EFR, If you know</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>> of such implementations, there is still some VERY short
time (less than</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> 2 weeks) before the IETF issues the
repeat WG last call. Please provide</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> any such
information directly to Stephen Casner <casner@acm.org>.</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>></FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>> Best regards,</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=2>> Simao.</FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>