<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=476355312-10122000>Hi
Paul</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000>Everything looks OK with me except the very 1st
change.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000>Specifically the empty <B>h323-message-body</B>
element for non call related Q.931 messages.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=476355312-10122000>The
empty <STRONG>h323-message-body</STRONG> does not allow to add tokens to
the FACILITY message so it cannot be authenticated and its integrity cannot be
checked.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000>My proposal is to change wording here to allow non
empty <STRONG>h323-message-body</STRONG> in the case security is
required</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000>Sasha </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=476355312-10122000></SPAN><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff> </FONT></SPAN></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Tahoma><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=476355312-10122000> </SPAN>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej@PACKETIZER.COM]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, December
09, 2000 12:06 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
ITU-SG16@mailbag.cps.intel.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Corrections to H.225.0v4 and
H.323v4<BR><B>Importance:</B> High<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>H.323 Experts,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I have attached a document that contains the complete
list of corrections for H.225.0v4 and H.323v4, with differences against the
decided text, that we have discussed on the mailing list this past
week.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I would like all interested parties to review these
changes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>I am open to changing the wording, but I would like to
get consensus on making these changes. I have asked the TSB to see if we
can make these corrections prior to the publication of the documents. If
so, I want to have the support of everyone to make these corrections. I
don't believe that any of these issues should be contentious, but without
these corrections, I'm afraid that many more questions and interoperability
problems will arise.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>If it turns out that we cannot update the approved text
before publication, I plan to submit this document (or a modified version with
comments I receive from you) to the next meeting in March. Personally,
I'd rather correct the Recommendation before publication, rather than adding
this to the Implementers Guide.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>Paul</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>