[itu-sg16] 答复: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.
noah at huawei.com
Wed Nov 17 03:09:10 EST 2010
It is not an exact description that I had freed the afternoon session for
joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6.
Indeed,what I have done is to avoid arranging any Q21,22,25 session for
Monday afternoon at Mr.Ishikawa's request.
Monday afternoon, according to our current Agenda,is to be used for other
Please have this clarification.
·¢¼þÈË: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com
[mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] ´ú±í Olivier Dubuisson
·¢ËÍÊ±¼ä: 2010Äê11ÔÂ16ÈÕ 23:08
ÊÕ¼þÈË: Paul E. Jones
³ËÍ: 'Ô½V µÇ'; itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com
Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.
it is my understanding that Noah has freed the afternoon session for the
joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. I will let
Chiaki-san confirm as he is the one who had the email exchange with Noah.
On 16/11/2010 16:03, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> It would be possible to use the meeting room during the lunch break (12:40
- 14:00). Another option is to have the meeting at 08:00 (or earlier). I
can be there early to help facilitate an early morning meeting, though I
would prefer that we not have that early morning meeting on the very first
day so that I can be free to help with logistical issues that might arise on
the first day.
> However, 14:00 is the time for meetings to resume, so it would not be
possible to use the room during that time unless Noah adjusts the schedule
to allocate time specifically for this meeting.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:51 AM
>> To: Paul E. Jones
>> Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; stefano.polidori at itu.int;
>> simao.campos at itu.int; Ô½V µÇ; Noah Luo£¨ÂÞÖÒ£©; ISHIKAWA Chiaki
>> Subject: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov
>> Dear Paul,
>> Allow me to introduce myself.
>> My name is Chiaki Ishikawa (SCAT) from Japan.
>> I am going to attend the meeting at Cisco building later this month.
>> Thank you for taking care of the meeting logistics and all that.
>> Now, I have to ask you a favor.
>> Some experts from Q.22, Q.21, and Q.25, as well as external experts from
>> ISO and elsewhere, have been discussing an issue that needs to be
>> resolved between ITU-T and ISO, and specifically JCA-NID meetings took
>> place this year to address this issue. The earlier meeting could not
>> resolve this, and so an liaison statement was sent from ITU-T SG16 to
>> ISO SC 31 WG6. And an informal ad-hoc meeting and teleconferences of
>> experts have been going on since August to address this issue.
>> We are close to some agreement about the technical direction (if I am
>> mistaken,) and also about the procedure (a formal response to the LS is
>> in the waiting to be voted by ISO SC 31 WG6 the last time I heard.)
>> Many participants of this ad-hoc meeting gather in Research Triangle to
>> attend this SG16 WP2 rapporteur meeting and so we would like to hold a
>> meeting for a couple of hours, at least, in the afternoon of Nov.
>> 29th to discuss this matter in an informal manner.
>> Mr. Noah Luo was kind enough to clear the schedule of Q.21, Q.22, and
>> Q.25 so that the experts involved in this issue can attend the meeting
>> without worry.
>> However, as it turned out, we have a room availability problem.
>> Stefano obviously consulted with you earlier, and it was suggested that
>> maybe we can use the main room for such a meeting in the afternoon. We
>> may need a telcon facility if possible. WAN access is a must if we go
>> the route of Skype for others who can't come and still want to attend.
>> Is the use of the "main room"(?) possible in the afternoon of Nov 29th?
>> (I hope to have a meeting from 14:00 so that we had enough time after
>> lunch, and 14:00 is 20:00 in Paris where an important stakeholder or two
>> can join by teleconference. We may be able to shift it by 30 minutes or
>> so both
>> We are an informal gathering and so if up-to seven or 8 (with
>> additional chairs if necessary) people can sit around a table and chat
>> informally, it might be OK. My point is that the room doesn't have to be
>> very big.
>> I hate to add another logistical request to yours, but I wonder if you
>> can help us in this matter.
>> Chiaki Ishikawa
France Telecom - Orange
Pilotage de la normalisation/Standards Steering
RD/DDEV - BP 50702 - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
tel: +33 2 96 05 38 50
More information about the sg16-avd