[itu-sg16] 答复: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.

[ishikawa]

Dear Paul,

Thank you for your help, indeed!

I am afraid that I missed reading your e-mail this morning.
So I was checking the hotel information you and Noah gave us some time ago.
(Your google map annotation was very, very helpful!)

Will the room be capable of holding maybe 5-8 people (with extra chairs)?
Then we are all set.

Thank you again for your kind help!

Sincerely,
Chiaki


On (11/18/2010 05:35 AM), simao.campos at itu.int wrote:
> Thanks, Paul!
> 
> That's excellent news.
> 
> Cheers,
> Simao
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Paul E. Jones
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 20:17
> To: 'ishikawa'; 'Noah Luo'
> Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; 'Ô½‰V µÇ'
> Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ´ð¸´: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.
> 
> Ishikawa-san,
> 
> I have some good news!  I had an exchange with the conference center team and they have given us a room next to our meeting room for the afternoon of the 29th for a conference call.
> 
> So, you will be able to have that call in parallel with the main meeting.
> 
> Paul
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:58 AM
>> To: Noah Luo
>> Cc: 'Olivier Dubuisson'; 'Paul E. Jones';
>> itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com;
>> 'Ô½‰V µÇ'
>> Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ´ð¸´: Extra room availability in the afternoon
>> of Nov 29th.
>>
>> Dear Mr. Noah Luo,
>>
>> Thank you for your post.
>>
>> It is indeed the case that the sessions for Q21, Q22, and Q25 are not
>> planned in the afternoon.
>> But we must find the space (and available time) for the informal
>> gathering.
>> That is another matter.
>>
>> I am trying now.
>>
>> Thank you for everyone's understanding, and I would like to thank Mr.
>> Luo for clearing the schedule for Q21, Q22 (and Q25 because some
>> experts need to attend it also) for our purpose.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Chiaki Ishikawa
>>
>>
>> On (11/17/2010 05:09 PM), Noah Luo wrote:
>>> Dear All
>>>
>>> It is not an exact description that I had freed the afternoon
>>> session for the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6.
>>>
>>> Indeed,what I have done is to avoid arranging any Q21,22,25 session
>>> for Monday afternoon at Mr.Ishikawa's request.
>>>
>>> Monday afternoon, according to our current Agenda,is to be used for
>>> other Questions.
>>> Please have this clarification.
>>>
>>> Noah
>>>
>>>
>>> -----ÓʼþÔ­¼þ-----
>>> ·¢¼þÈË: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com
>>> [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] ´ú±í Olivier Dubuisson
>>> ·¢ËÍʱ¼ä: 2010Äê11ÔÂ16ÈÕ 23:08
>>> ÊÕ¼þÈË: Paul E. Jones
>>> ³­ËÍ: 'Ô½‰V µÇ'; itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com
>>> Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov
>> 29th.
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> it is my understanding that Noah has freed the afternoon session for
>>> the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. I will
>>> let Chiaki-san confirm as he is the one who had the email exchange
>>> with
>> Noah.
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> On 16/11/2010 16:03, Paul E. Jones wrote:
>>>> Ishikawa-san,
>>>>
>>>> It would be possible to use the meeting room during the lunch break
>>>> (12:40
>>> - 14:00).  Another option is to have the meeting at 08:00 (or
>>> earlier).  I can be there early to help facilitate an early morning
>>> meeting, though I would prefer that we not have that early morning
>>> meeting on the very first day so that I can be free to help with
>>> logistical issues that might arise on the first day.
>>>>
>>>> However, 14:00 is the time for meetings to resume, so it would not
>>>> be
>>> possible to use the room during that time unless Noah adjusts the
>>> schedule to allocate time specifically for this meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:51 AM
>>>>> To: Paul E. Jones
>>>>> Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; stefano.polidori at itu.int;
>>>>> simao.campos at itu.int; Ô½‰V µÇ; Noah Luo£¨ÂÞÖÒ£©; ISHIKAWA Chiaki
>>>>> Subject: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of
>>>>> Nov 29th.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Paul,
>>>>>
>>>>> Allow me to introduce myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> My name is Chiaki Ishikawa (SCAT) from Japan.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am going to attend the meeting at Cisco building later this month.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for taking care of the meeting logistics and all that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, I have to ask you a favor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some experts from Q.22, Q.21, and Q.25, as well as external
>>>>> experts from ISO and elsewhere, have been discussing an issue that
>>>>> needs to be resolved between ITU-T and ISO, and specifically
>>>>> JCA-NID meetings took place this year to address this issue. The
>>>>> earlier meeting could not resolve this, and so an liaison
>>>>> statement was sent from ITU-T SG16 to ISO SC 31 WG6. And an
>>>>> informal ad-hoc meeting and teleconferences of experts have been
>>>>> going on since August to
>> address this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are close to some agreement about the technical direction (if I
>>>>> am not
>>>>> mistaken,) and also about the procedure (a formal response to the
>>>>> LS is in the waiting to be voted by ISO SC 31 WG6 the last time I
>>>>> heard.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Many participants of this ad-hoc meeting gather in Research
>>>>> Triangle to attend this SG16 WP2 rapporteur meeting and so we
>>>>> would like to hold a meeting for a couple of hours, at least, in
>>>>> the afternoon of
>> Nov.
>>>>> 29th to discuss this matter in an informal manner.
>>>>> Mr. Noah Luo was kind enough to clear the schedule of Q.21, Q.22,
>>>>> and
>>>>> Q.25 so that the experts involved in this issue can attend the
>>>>> meeting without worry.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, as it turned out, we have a room availability problem.
>>>>> Stefano obviously consulted with you earlier, and it was suggested
>>>>> that maybe we can use the main room for such a meeting in the
>>>>> afternoon. We may need a telcon facility if possible. WAN access
>>>>> is a must if we go the route of Skype for others who can't come
>>>>> and
>> still want to attend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the use of the "main room"(?) possible in the afternoon of Nov
>> 29th?
>>>>> (I hope to have  a meeting from 14:00 so that we had enough time
>>>>> after lunch, and 14:00 is 20:00 in Paris where an important
>>>>> stakeholder or two can join by teleconference. We may be able to
>>>>> shift it by 30 minutes or so both
>>>>> ways.)
>>>>>
>>>>> We are an informal gathering and so if  up-to seven or 8 (with
>>>>> additional chairs if necessary)  people can sit around a table and
>>>>> chat informally, it might be OK. My point is that the room doesn't
>>>>> have to be very big.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate to add another logistical request to yours, but I wonder if
>>>>> you can help us in this matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Chiaki Ishikawa
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>