[itu-sg16] 答复: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.

Wed Nov 17 15:35:02 EST 2010

Thanks, Paul!

That's excellent news.

Cheers,
Simao

-----Original Message-----
From: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Paul E. Jones
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 20:17
To: 'ishikawa'; 'Noah Luo'
Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; 'Ô½‰V µÇ'
Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ´ð¸´: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.

Ishikawa-san,

I have some good news!  I had an exchange with the conference center team and they have given us a room next to our meeting room for the afternoon of the 29th for a conference call.

So, you will be able to have that call in parallel with the main meeting.

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:58 AM
> To: Noah Luo
> Cc: 'Olivier Dubuisson'; 'Paul E. Jones'; 
> itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com;
> 'Ô½‰V µÇ'
> Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ´ð¸´: Extra room availability in the afternoon 
> of Nov 29th.
> 
> Dear Mr. Noah Luo,
> 
> Thank you for your post.
> 
> It is indeed the case that the sessions for Q21, Q22, and Q25 are not 
> planned in the afternoon.
> But we must find the space (and available time) for the informal 
> gathering.
> That is another matter.
> 
> I am trying now.
> 
> Thank you for everyone's understanding, and I would like to thank Mr.
> Luo for clearing the schedule for Q21, Q22 (and Q25 because some 
> experts need to attend it also) for our purpose.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Chiaki Ishikawa
> 
> 
> On (11/17/2010 05:09 PM), Noah Luo wrote:
> > Dear All
> >
> > It is not an exact description that I had freed the afternoon 
> > session for the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6.
> >
> > Indeed,what I have done is to avoid arranging any Q21,22,25 session 
> > for Monday afternoon at Mr.Ishikawa's request.
> >
> > Monday afternoon, according to our current Agenda,is to be used for 
> > other Questions.
> > Please have this clarification.
> >
> > Noah
> >
> >
> > -----ÓÊ¼þÔ¼þ-----
> > ·¢¼þÈË: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com
> > [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] ´ú±í Olivier Dubuisson
> > ·¢ËÍÊ±¼ä: 2010Äê11ÔÂ16ÈÕ 23:08
> > ÊÕ¼þÈË: Paul E. Jones
> > ³ËÍ: 'Ô½‰V µÇ'; itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com
> > Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov
> 29th.
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > it is my understanding that Noah has freed the afternoon session for 
> > the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. I will 
> > let Chiaki-san confirm as he is the one who had the email exchange 
> > with
> Noah.
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > On 16/11/2010 16:03, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> >> Ishikawa-san,
> >>
> >> It would be possible to use the meeting room during the lunch break
> >> (12:40
> > - 14:00).  Another option is to have the meeting at 08:00 (or 
> > earlier).  I can be there early to help facilitate an early morning 
> > meeting, though I would prefer that we not have that early morning 
> > meeting on the very first day so that I can be free to help with 
> > logistical issues that might arise on the first day.
> >>
> >> However, 14:00 is the time for meetings to resume, so it would not 
> >> be
> > possible to use the room during that time unless Noah adjusts the 
> > schedule to allocate time specifically for this meeting.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:51 AM
> >>> To: Paul E. Jones
> >>> Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; stefano.polidori at itu.int; 
> >>> simao.campos at itu.int; Ô½‰V µÇ; Noah Luo£¨ÂÞÖÒ£©; ISHIKAWA Chiaki
> >>> Subject: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of 
> >>> Nov 29th.
> >>>
> >>> Dear Paul,
> >>>
> >>> Allow me to introduce myself.
> >>>
> >>> My name is Chiaki Ishikawa (SCAT) from Japan.
> >>>
> >>> I am going to attend the meeting at Cisco building later this month.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for taking care of the meeting logistics and all that.
> >>>
> >>> Now, I have to ask you a favor.
> >>>
> >>> Some experts from Q.22, Q.21, and Q.25, as well as external 
> >>> experts from ISO and elsewhere, have been discussing an issue that 
> >>> needs to be resolved between ITU-T and ISO, and specifically 
> >>> JCA-NID meetings took place this year to address this issue. The 
> >>> earlier meeting could not resolve this, and so an liaison 
> >>> statement was sent from ITU-T SG16 to ISO SC 31 WG6. And an 
> >>> informal ad-hoc meeting and teleconferences of experts have been 
> >>> going on since August to
> address this issue.
> >>>
> >>> We are close to some agreement about the technical direction (if I 
> >>> am not
> >>> mistaken,) and also about the procedure (a formal response to the 
> >>> LS is in the waiting to be voted by ISO SC 31 WG6 the last time I
> >>> heard.)
> >>>
> >>> Many participants of this ad-hoc meeting gather in Research 
> >>> Triangle to attend this SG16 WP2 rapporteur meeting and so we 
> >>> would like to hold a meeting for a couple of hours, at least, in 
> >>> the afternoon of
> Nov.
> >>> 29th to discuss this matter in an informal manner.
> >>> Mr. Noah Luo was kind enough to clear the schedule of Q.21, Q.22, 
> >>> and
> >>> Q.25 so that the experts involved in this issue can attend the 
> >>> meeting without worry.
> >>>
> >>> However, as it turned out, we have a room availability problem.
> >>> Stefano obviously consulted with you earlier, and it was suggested 
> >>> that maybe we can use the main room for such a meeting in the 
> >>> afternoon. We may need a telcon facility if possible. WAN access 
> >>> is a must if we go the route of Skype for others who can't come 
> >>> and
> still want to attend.
> >>>
> >>> Is the use of the "main room"(?) possible in the afternoon of Nov
> 29th?
> >>> (I hope to have  a meeting from 14:00 so that we had enough time 
> >>> after lunch, and 14:00 is 20:00 in Paris where an important 
> >>> stakeholder or two can join by teleconference. We may be able to 
> >>> shift it by 30 minutes or so both
> >>> ways.)
> >>>
> >>> We are an informal gathering and so if  up-to seven or 8 (with 
> >>> additional chairs if necessary)  people can sit around a table and 
> >>> chat informally, it might be OK. My point is that the room doesn't 
> >>> have to be very big.
> >>>
> >>> I hate to add another logistical request to yours, but I wonder if 
> >>> you can help us in this matter.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Chiaki Ishikawa
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 