[itu-sg16] 答复: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.
simao.campos at itu.int
simao.campos at itu.int
Wed Nov 17 15:35:02 EST 2010
That's excellent news.
From: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] On Behalf Of Paul E. Jones
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 20:17
To: 'ishikawa'; 'Noah Luo'
Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; 'Ô½V µÇ'
Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ´ð¸´: Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.
I have some good news! I had an exchange with the conference center team and they have given us a room next to our meeting room for the afternoon of the 29th for a conference call.
So, you will be able to have that call in parallel with the main meeting.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 3:58 AM
> To: Noah Luo
> Cc: 'Olivier Dubuisson'; 'Paul E. Jones';
> itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com;
> 'Ô½V µÇ'
> Subject: Re: [itu-sg16] ´ð¸´: Extra room availability in the afternoon
> of Nov 29th.
> Dear Mr. Noah Luo,
> Thank you for your post.
> It is indeed the case that the sessions for Q21, Q22, and Q25 are not
> planned in the afternoon.
> But we must find the space (and available time) for the informal
> That is another matter.
> I am trying now.
> Thank you for everyone's understanding, and I would like to thank Mr.
> Luo for clearing the schedule for Q21, Q22 (and Q25 because some
> experts need to attend it also) for our purpose.
> Chiaki Ishikawa
> On (11/17/2010 05:09 PM), Noah Luo wrote:
> > Dear All
> > It is not an exact description that I had freed the afternoon
> > session for the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6.
> > Indeed,what I have done is to avoid arranging any Q21,22,25 session
> > for Monday afternoon at Mr.Ishikawa's request.
> > Monday afternoon, according to our current Agenda,is to be used for
> > other Questions.
> > Please have this clarification.
> > Noah
> > -----ÓÊ¼þÔ¼þ-----
> > ·¢¼þÈË: itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com
> > [mailto:itu-sg16-bounces at lists.packetizer.com] ´ú±í Olivier Dubuisson
> > ·¢ËÍÊ±¼ä: 2010Äê11ÔÂ16ÈÕ 23:08
> > ÊÕ¼þÈË: Paul E. Jones
> > ³ËÍ: 'Ô½V µÇ'; itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com
> > Ö÷Ìâ: Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov
> > Paul,
> > it is my understanding that Noah has freed the afternoon session for
> > the joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. I will
> > let Chiaki-san confirm as he is the one who had the email exchange
> > with
> > Olivier
> > On 16/11/2010 16:03, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> >> Ishikawa-san,
> >> It would be possible to use the meeting room during the lunch break
> >> (12:40
> > - 14:00). Another option is to have the meeting at 08:00 (or
> > earlier). I can be there early to help facilitate an early morning
> > meeting, though I would prefer that we not have that early morning
> > meeting on the very first day so that I can be free to help with
> > logistical issues that might arise on the first day.
> >> However, 14:00 is the time for meetings to resume, so it would not
> >> be
> > possible to use the room during that time unless Noah adjusts the
> > schedule to allocate time specifically for this meeting.
> >> Paul
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:51 AM
> >>> To: Paul E. Jones
> >>> Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; stefano.polidori at itu.int;
> >>> simao.campos at itu.int; Ô½V µÇ; Noah Luo£¨ÂÞÖÒ£©; ISHIKAWA Chiaki
> >>> Subject: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of
> >>> Nov 29th.
> >>> Dear Paul,
> >>> Allow me to introduce myself.
> >>> My name is Chiaki Ishikawa (SCAT) from Japan.
> >>> I am going to attend the meeting at Cisco building later this month.
> >>> Thank you for taking care of the meeting logistics and all that.
> >>> Now, I have to ask you a favor.
> >>> Some experts from Q.22, Q.21, and Q.25, as well as external
> >>> experts from ISO and elsewhere, have been discussing an issue that
> >>> needs to be resolved between ITU-T and ISO, and specifically
> >>> JCA-NID meetings took place this year to address this issue. The
> >>> earlier meeting could not resolve this, and so an liaison
> >>> statement was sent from ITU-T SG16 to ISO SC 31 WG6. And an
> >>> informal ad-hoc meeting and teleconferences of experts have been
> >>> going on since August to
> address this issue.
> >>> We are close to some agreement about the technical direction (if I
> >>> am not
> >>> mistaken,) and also about the procedure (a formal response to the
> >>> LS is in the waiting to be voted by ISO SC 31 WG6 the last time I
> >>> heard.)
> >>> Many participants of this ad-hoc meeting gather in Research
> >>> Triangle to attend this SG16 WP2 rapporteur meeting and so we
> >>> would like to hold a meeting for a couple of hours, at least, in
> >>> the afternoon of
> >>> 29th to discuss this matter in an informal manner.
> >>> Mr. Noah Luo was kind enough to clear the schedule of Q.21, Q.22,
> >>> and
> >>> Q.25 so that the experts involved in this issue can attend the
> >>> meeting without worry.
> >>> However, as it turned out, we have a room availability problem.
> >>> Stefano obviously consulted with you earlier, and it was suggested
> >>> that maybe we can use the main room for such a meeting in the
> >>> afternoon. We may need a telcon facility if possible. WAN access
> >>> is a must if we go the route of Skype for others who can't come
> >>> and
> still want to attend.
> >>> Is the use of the "main room"(?) possible in the afternoon of Nov
> >>> (I hope to have a meeting from 14:00 so that we had enough time
> >>> after lunch, and 14:00 is 20:00 in Paris where an important
> >>> stakeholder or two can join by teleconference. We may be able to
> >>> shift it by 30 minutes or so both
> >>> ways.)
> >>> We are an informal gathering and so if up-to seven or 8 (with
> >>> additional chairs if necessary) people can sit around a table and
> >>> chat informally, it might be OK. My point is that the room doesn't
> >>> have to be very big.
> >>> I hate to add another logistical request to yours, but I wonder if
> >>> you can help us in this matter.
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Chiaki Ishikawa
More information about the sg16-avd