[itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov 29th.

[Paul E. Jones]

Stephen,

14:00 is currently scheduled as a Q2/Q12 meeting, unless Noah has revised the schedule very recently.

In any case, if the schedule is revised to accommodate the meeting, then having the special session is not an issue, though the room will be occupied by everybody, not just the 10 or so interested in the meeting.

I'd recommend an early morning meeting so we don't have to compress the schedule and to allow the meeting to be a little more intimate.

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Botzko, Stephen [mailto:Stephen.Botzko at polycom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:28 PM
> To: 'Olivier Dubuisson'; 'Paul E. Jones'
> Cc: '?? ?'; 'itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com'
> Subject: RE: Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of
> Nov 29th.
> 
> Those were both Q5 sessions, correct?  Did Noah reschedule or cancel?
> 
> Steve B.
> 
> Sent by Good Messaging (www.good.com)
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Olivier Dubuisson [mailto:olivier.dubuisson at orange-
> ftgroup.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 16, 2010 11:18 AM Pacific Standard Time
> To:	Paul E. Jones
> Cc:	'越塚 登'; itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com
> Subject:	Re: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of
> Nov 29th.
> 
> Paul,
> 
> it is my understanding that Noah has freed the afternoon session for the
> joint meeting between Q.21,22/16 and JTC 1/SC 31/WG 6. I will let
> Chiaki-san confirm as he is the one who had the email exchange with
> Noah.
> 
> Olivier
> 
> On 16/11/2010 16:03, Paul E. Jones wrote:
> > Ishikawa-san,
> >
> > It would be possible to use the meeting room during the lunch break
> (12:40 - 14:00).  Another option is to have the meeting at 08:00 (or
> earlier).  I can be there early to help facilitate an early morning
> meeting, though I would prefer that we not have that early morning
> meeting on the very first day so that I can be free to help with
> logistical issues that might arise on the first day.
> >
> > However, 14:00 is the time for meetings to resume, so it would not be
> possible to use the room during that time unless Noah adjusts the
> schedule to allocate time specifically for this meeting.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ishikawa [mailto:chiaki.ishikawa at ubin.jp]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:51 AM
> >> To: Paul E. Jones
> >> Cc: itu-sg16 at lists.packetizer.com; stefano.polidori at itu.int;
> >> simao.campos at itu.int; 越塚 登; Noah Luo（罗忠）; ISHIKAWA Chiaki
> >> Subject: [itu-sg16] Extra room availability in the afternoon of Nov
> >> 29th.
> >>
> >> Dear Paul,
> >>
> >> Allow me to introduce myself.
> >>
> >> My name is Chiaki Ishikawa (SCAT) from Japan.
> >>
> >> I am going to attend the meeting at Cisco building later this month.
> >>
> >> Thank you for taking care of the meeting logistics and all that.
> >>
> >> Now, I have to ask you a favor.
> >>
> >> Some experts from Q.22, Q.21, and Q.25, as well as external experts
> >> from ISO and elsewhere, have been discussing an issue that needs to
> >> be resolved between ITU-T and ISO, and specifically JCA-NID meetings
> >> took place this year to address this issue. The earlier meeting could
> >> not resolve this, and so an liaison statement was sent from ITU-T
> >> SG16 to ISO SC 31 WG6. And an informal ad-hoc meeting and
> >> teleconferences of experts have been going on since August to address
> this issue.
> >>
> >> We are close to some agreement about the technical direction (if I am
> >> not
> >> mistaken,) and also about the procedure (a formal response to the LS
> >> is in the waiting to be voted by ISO SC 31 WG6 the last time I
> >> heard.)
> >>
> >> Many participants of this ad-hoc meeting gather in Research Triangle
> >> to attend this SG16 WP2 rapporteur meeting and so we would like to
> >> hold a meeting for a couple of hours, at least, in the afternoon of
> Nov.
> >> 29th to discuss this matter in an informal manner.
> >> Mr. Noah Luo was kind enough to clear the schedule of Q.21, Q.22, and
> >> Q.25 so that the experts involved in this issue can attend the
> >> meeting without worry.
> >>
> >> However, as it turned out, we have a room availability problem.
> >> Stefano obviously consulted with you earlier, and it was suggested
> >> that maybe we can use the main room for such a meeting in the
> >> afternoon. We may need a telcon facility if possible. WAN access is a
> >> must if we go the route of Skype for others who can't come and still
> want to attend.
> >>
> >> Is the use of the "main room"(?) possible in the afternoon of Nov
> 29th?
> >> (I hope to have  a meeting from 14:00 so that we had enough time
> >> after lunch, and 14:00 is 20:00 in Paris where an important
> >> stakeholder or two can join by teleconference. We may be able to
> >> shift it by 30 minutes or so both
> >> ways.)
> >>
> >> We are an informal gathering and so if  up-to seven or 8 (with
> >> additional chairs if necessary)  people can sit around a table and
> >> chat informally, it might be OK. My point is that the room doesn't
> >> have to be very big.
> >>
> >> I hate to add another logistical request to yours, but I wonder if
> >> you can help us in this matter.
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Chiaki Ishikawa
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Olivier DUBUISSON
> France Telecom - Orange
> Pilotage de la normalisation/Standards Steering RD/DDEV - BP 50702 -
> 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
> tel: +33 2 96 05 38 50