Document number allocation request

[youichi.takashima at ubin.jp]

We should consider in Q3 already at least the 2 H.248 (Q.3) related LSs,
because we've almost 10 contributions related to the TISPAN LS, and Ottawa
is the only chance to provide Q5/11 feedback on the H.248 Rw Profile before
their next SG11 meeting.

- Albrecht




                                                                                                                                      
                      "Paul E. Jones"                                                                                                 
                      <paulej at PACKETIZ         To:      Albrecht SCHWARZ/DE/ALCATEL at ALCATEL                                           
                      ER.COM>                  cc:      <itu-sg16 at external.cisco.com>                                                 
                                               Subject: RE: LSs from SG11 and TIPSAN; Re: Document number requests                    
                      17.08.2006 19:18                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                      




If they get posted, I will grab them.  Otherwise, do you think it will
present an issue if we do not review them until the November meeting?

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albrecht.Schwarz at alcatel.de [mailto:Albrecht.Schwarz at alcatel.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:17 AM
> To: Paul E. Jones
> Cc: itu-sg16 at external.cisco.com
> Subject: RE: LSs from SG11 and TIPSAN; Re: Document number requests
>
>
> Both meetings took place in July.
> Don't know the LS handling process by the EDH.
> Would be surprised if they were not already in the pipeline.
> - Albrecht
>
>
>
>
>                       "Paul E. Jones"
>                       <paulej at packetiz         To:      Albrecht
> SCHWARZ/DE/ALCATEL at ALCATEL
>                       er.com>                  cc:      <itu-
> sg16 at external.cisco.com>
>                                                Subject: RE: LSs from SG11
> and TIPSAN; Re: Document number requests
>                       17.08.2006 15:50
>
>
>
>
>
> Albrecht,
>
> I have been watching the liaison statements that have been made available
> for SG16 since the last meeting.
>
> I did not see these.  Were those just released?
>
> Paul
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Albrecht.Schwarz at alcatel.de [mailto:Albrecht.Schwarz at alcatel.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 5:49 AM
> > To: Paul E. Jones
> > Cc: itu-sg16 at external.cisco.com
> > Subject: LSs from SG11 and TIPSAN; Re: Document number requests
> >
> >
> > Paul,
> > this email is only fyi.
> > I'm aware of 3 LSs from SG11 & ETSI, submitted to Q.3 and Q.23 (see
> > below),
> > which are not yet in our Ottawa contributions list.
> > Guess that the LSs will appear as GEN-xxx-16 input sometime.
> >
> > Regards, Albrecht
> >
> >
> >
> >       Reference: T05-SG11-060724-TD-PLEN-0105!!MSW-E
> >
> |-------+-----------+----------------------+------------------------
> > ------------------|
> >       |   1   | 3/11      | ITU-T SG 16 (Q.23/16)|Media Codec
> requirements
> > in NGN           |
> >
> |-------+-----------+----------------------+------------------------
> > ------------------|
> >       |   2   | 5/11      | ITU-T SG 16 (Q.3/16) |H.248 items related
to
> > Draft ITU-T Rec.   |
> >       |       |           |                      |Q.rcp3.2 "H.248 Rw
> > Profile"               |
> >
> |-------+-----------+----------------------+------------------------
> > ------------------|
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         ETSI reference: 11TD045;
> >
> >         http://docbox.etsi.org/tispan/tispan/50-20060711-Sophia-
> > P11/11TD045%20LSreply_to_ITUTSG16_on_H248packages.doc
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>