The question about extension of an H.248 package.
Christian Groves
christian.groves at ERICSSON.COM
Thu Jun 16 00:34:51 EDT 2005
Hello Sasha,
There is no hard rule of what to propose. It really depends on the type of
information you want added.
I think the only time the package extension should be used is if the added
properties/signals/events provide a set of functions of their own right.
e.g.
would it makes sense that these properties could be a package by
themselves but
need another package to operate. For example: The tone gen package. The
DTMF was
added as a extension package as DTMF generation is its own subset
functionality
but is related to the generation of tones.
Regards, Christian
Sasha Ruditsky wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm working on a proposal for July meeting to add some new properties to
> one of the H.248.19 packages.
>>From H.248 document it appears that there are defined (at least) two
> ways of doing this.
>
> * Creating a new version of an existing package
> * Creating a new package that extends the existing one.
>
>
> Can somebody please comment on the factors helping to determine which of
> these two mechanisms should be uses?
>
> Thanks,
> Sasha
> .
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3110 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.packetizer.com/pipermail/sg16-avd/attachments/20050615/db4225a5/attachment-0006.bin>
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list