Proposal to support AMR codec in H.245 using RFC3267
lindbergh at 92F1.COM
Tue Jan 25 19:50:42 EST 2005
Is there a reason why this needs to be a separate Annex to H.245? I'd
prefer to incorporate this material into an existing Annex, just to reduce
the amount of clutter in H.245.
At 05:32 PM 1/24/2005, Venkata Nanduri wrote:
>Dear SG16 experts,
>I would like the attached proposal to be submitted to next meeting of
>group to be held at
>Melbourne in February last week, 2005.
>Before I submit the proposal formally, I would like to get some early
>feedback on the proposal
>from experts in the group.
>Can you please review the document and let me know your comments?
100 Minuteman Road
Andover MA 01810 USA
Voice: +1 978 292 5366
Email: lindbergh at 92F1.com
H.320, H.323 video by arrangement
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2678 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the sg16-avd