Fwd:Re: WG: Meeting of Q.1

OKUBO Sakae okubo at MXZ.MESH.NE.JP
Fri Apr 2 07:10:27 EST 2004


*** forwarded to experts who are interested in Q.1 related works ***

At 19:14 +0200 04/04/01, Patrick Luthi wrote:
>Dear Mr. Sun,
>
>Thank you for your message and for sharing your plans to submit 
>contributions to progress the work of Q.1.
>
>So far, your contributions are the first ones that have been offered 
>for this upcoming meeting. I am waiting until April 7, as I said in 
>my e-mail, to see how many contributions are coming, and how many 
>different member organizations plan to send representatives.
>
>As you may already know, under the ITU-T rules, we must have a 
>significant number of both contributions and member organizations 
>wanting to attend in order to justify an interim experts meeting. 
>The reason for this is to ensure that the result of such meeting 
>represents a true consensus of interested ITU-T members.
>
>In the past, Q.1 has rarely held interim Rapporteur meetings 
>(despite tentative plans at SG meetings) because of the absence of a 
>substantial number of contributions; there were only 2 such meetings 
>in the last 4 years and most of the work has been done during the SG 
>meetings. If we do not meet in Beijing, the work of Q.1 will 
>progress by e-mail correspondence, and you will have an opportunity 
>to present your contributions both on the e-mail reflector (at any 
>time of your choosing) and at the next meeting of Q.1 (at latest 
>during the November meeting of SG16 in Geneva).
>
>I very much hope that there will be enough contributions and 
>attendees to hold a meeting in Beijing. We will know by April 7. I 
>was personally hoping to visit Beijing for the meeting.
>
>I will keep you and the other Q.1 experts informed about the result 
>and the final decision as soon as possible after April 7.
>
>I am looking forward to collaborating with you and would like to 
>thank you for your continuing interest in Q.1 matters.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Patrick Luthi
>Rapporteur for Q.1/16
>
>At 11:34 04/01/2004 +0800, sun.zhibin at zte.com.cn wrote:
>
>>Dear Mr. Luthi,
>>
>>During January SG16 meeting, ZTE Corp. made two contributions about 
>>the use of HSD for
>>the second video stream and a new digital channel aggregation 
>>procedure. I would like to provide
>>some papers to further describe and discuss these two contributins 
>>during this Rapportuer
>>meeting.
>>
>>So, a Rapporteur meeting of Q.1 is necessary in Beijing during the 
>>week of May
>>  11-14, 2004. I hope to meet every expert of Q.1 in Beijing.
>>
>>All of you are welcome to China, a beautiful oriental country.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Sun Zhibin
>>
>>sun.zhibin at zte.com.cn
>>
>>
>>
>>Patrick Luthi <patrick.luthi at ties.itu.int>
>>$B!F(BA$B7c]ac!b(BY owner-tsg16q1 at itu.int
>>
>>2004-03-30 15:45
>>$B"s!=!DGa(Be$B!I(B $B!FS(BPatrick Luthi
>>
>>         $B€p7c]ac!b(BY        "Q.1/16" <tsg16q1 at itu.int>
>>         $B!D(BL$B!0(Bl$B!b(BY        "Rapporteurs WP2":;
>>         ý$BUa(BO$B/a#:(B        Q.1/16 Rapporteur meeting
>>
>>
>>Dear experts,
>>
>>Q.D.F,G, 2-5/16 are planning to have a Rapporteur meeting in Beijing, China
>>during the week of May 11-14, 2004.
>>
>>Q.1 had tentatively planned to hold interim meetings if needed before the
>>November SG16 meeting, but, since I have not heard of any potential
>>contributions or interest from experts to attend such meeting, I would like
>>to announce that Q.1 will not meet at this time. Nevertheless, there will
>>be other opportunities for Q.1 to meet later this year.
>>
>>Please let me know by April 7, 2004 if you believe that there is a need for
>>Q.1 to hold a Rapporteur meeting in May. After that deadline, I will inform
>>the SG16 management and the TSB that Q.1 will not be meeting.
>>
>>  Best regards,
>>
>>  Patrick Luthi
>>  Rapporteur for Q.1/16
>>



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list