H.323v4 references H.235v1?

Paul Long plong at IPDIALOG.COM
Mon Jun 24 15:42:55 EDT 2002

I just noticed that H.323v4 references H.235v1 (1998) rather than H.235v2
(2000). Is this correct/intentional? I'm not sure about the chronology, so
maybe H.235v2 wasn't available when H.323v4 was Decided.

Paul Long
ipDialog, Inc.

More information about the sg16-avd mailing list