Gregory gregoryduez at BELGACOM.NET
Mon Jul 1 13:41:46 EDT 2002

According to my memories, H.235v2 was approved in 2000 in parallel to
H.323v4. Thus, H.323 shall only use the newer reference of course, and
everything else should be considered an error, that has to be corrected.

With kind regards

Martin Euchner.
| Dipl.-Inf.                     Rapporteur Q.G/SG16
| Martin Euchner                 Phone: +49 89 722 55790
| Siemens AG.....................Fax  : +49 89 722 47713
| ICN M SR 3                     mailto:Martin.Euchner at
|                                mailto:martin.euchner at
| Hofmannstr. 51                 Intranet:
| D-81359 Muenchen               Internet:
| __________________
| Germany

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Paul Long [mailto:plong at IPDIALOG.COM]
Sent:   Monday, June 24, 2002 9:43 PM
To:     ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM
Subject:        H.323v4 references H.235v1?

I just noticed that H.323v4 references H.235v1 (1998) rather than H.235v2
(2000). Is this correct/intentional? I'm not sure about the chronology, so
maybe H.235v2 wasn't available when H.323v4 was Decided.

Paul Long
ipDialog, Inc.

More information about the sg16-avd mailing list