delayed contribution uploaded
Sasha Ruditsky
sasha at RADVISION.COM
Fri Jan 25 10:19:11 EST 2002
All,
A clash of overlapping OIDs values has been detected in H.235Version 2.
OIDs "K", "L" and "M" in the Appendix I currently have the same value
assigned as OIDs "A", "B" and "R" of Annex E. However, of course each of the
mentioned OIDs shall have a unique value in order to unambiguously identify
its purpose. Implementations deploying OIDs from Annex E and Appendix I
might thus currently run into interoperability problems.
It is proposed to re-allocate the OIDs in Appendix I with new and distinct
values (see below).
Object Identifier Reference
Object Identifier Value
Description
"K" {itu-t (0) recommendation (0) h (8) 235 version (0) 2 31}
indicates a RADIUS challenge in the ClearToken
"L" {itu-t (0) recommendation (0) h (8) 235 version (0) 2 32}
indicates a RADIUS response (conveyed in the challenge field) in the
ClearToken
"M" {itu-t (0) recommendation (0) h (8) 235 version (0) 2 33}
indicates BES default mode with a protected password in the ClearToken
Table I.1/H.235: Object Identifiers used by Appendix I.4.6
Please, let me hear your opinion on whether the proposal appears acceptable,
or suggest your alternative otherwise.
With kind regards
Martin Euchner.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dipl.-Inf. Phone: +49 89 722 55790
| Martin Euchner Fax : +49 89 722 47713
| Siemens AG
| ICN M SR 3 mailto:Martin.Euchner at icn.siemens.de
<mailto:Martin.Euchner at icn.siemens.de>
| mailto:martin.euchner at ties.itu.int
<mailto:martin.euchner at ties.itu.int>
| Hofmannstr. 51 Intranet:
http://intranet.icn.siemens.de/marketing/sr/pages/122/122_euchner.htm
<http://intranet.icn.siemens.de/marketing/sr/pages/122/122_euchner.htm>
| D-81359 Muenchen Internet: http://www.siemens.de/
<http://www.siemens.de/>
| __________________
| Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the sg16-avd
mailing list