AW: Rapporteur meeting in February 2003

Wed Dec 18 02:33:19 EST 2002

Gary,

thanks for the clarification.

Few remaining questions:

1) What does the "technical freeze" actually mean? No new technical
contributions? Or only corrections on technologies, if any, if e.g.
requirements are not fulfilled or editorial, typographical changes?

2) What is the purpose of a consent meeting in March? Will there be a "last
call" immediately afterwards? Is the Mai SG Meeting planned to process the
expected comments received? Or, the last call would go out only after the
May meeting? In that case why the March Meeting?

Kind regards,
Istvan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gary Sullivan [mailto:garysull at microsoft.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2002 02:17
An: Sebestyen Istvan ICN M SR 3; ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM
Betreff: RE: Rapporteur meeting in February 2003

Istvan et al,

The current plan is for JVT to meet in Pattaya with MPEG.  WP3 will then
either be in Pattaya on or
about the 15th of March or soon thereafter elsewhere.

The previous plan was drafted under the expectation that we would need to
deliver FDIS text in
mid-February as an interim editing output on the MPEG side.
We now plan to allow more time for editing and final technical double-check,
so FDIS text is not needed
that soon.  Although technical freeze was declared last week, FDIS is not
going to happen until March now
so that we can have a more mature document.  This lessens the schedule
pressure on the MPEG side
somewhat.  We can benefit from that extra time by doing the same
thing on the ITU side and aligning text delivery and final technical
double-check in both organizations.
This will still enable ITU-T decision no later than May, which is what it
probably would have been anyway
regardless of whether we did consent somwhat earlier.

Best Regards,

-Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebestyen Istvan ICN M SR 3 [mailto:istvan.sebestyen at SIEMENS.COM] 
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 6:46 AM
To: ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM
Subject: AW: Rapporteur meeting in February 2003

So, how then are the plans concretely?

On March 11-15, 2003 there is an MPEG Meeting in Pattaya. So, H.264 goes to
FDIS.
But:

1) When and where is the JVT Meeting?
2) When and where is the WP3 Meeting?

Kind regards,
Istvan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gary Sullivan [mailto:garysull at microsoft.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2002 12:05
An: Sebestyen Istvan ICN M SR 3; ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM
Betreff: RE: Rapporteur meeting in February 2003

Yes, we are planning for WP3 consent for H.264/AVC sometime between March 15
and March 30.
This will let us consent a better draft and coordinate better with the
ISO/IEC approval process.

Best Regards,

-Gary S.
  _____  

From:    Sebestyen Istvan ICN M SR 3 [mailto:istvan.sebestyen at SIEMENS.COM]

Sent:    Mon 12/16/2002 2:32 AM	
To:      ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM	
Subject:         AW: Rapporteur meeting in February 2003	

Dear Mr. Okubo,

Thanks.
For mid February also a one day WP3 meeting in Geneva was planned to make
"consent" for H.264. Has that also gone away?

Regards,
Istvan Sebestyen

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: OKUBO Sakae [ mailto:okubo at MXZ.MESH.NE.JP <mailto:okubo at MXZ.MESH.NE.JP>
]
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Dezember 2002 05:12
An: ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM
Betreff: Fwd: Rapporteur meeting in February 2003

Dear Q.D,F,G,1-5/16 experts,

The conclusion last week in Awajishima, Japan, was that Q.6/WP3 would
not meet as a whole next February. So we will meet in San Jose during
11-14 February 2003 according to 2/ below. Mr. Jones will issue the
meeting notice very soon.

At 16:23 +0900 02/12/07, OKUBO Sakae wrote:
>[...]
>Rapporteurs have been seeking the best place to hold this meeting.
>This is to report the progress.
>
>1/ As default, we will meet in Geneva to handle video related topics
>with Q.6 experts who will meet there for WP3 consent of H.264.
>
>2/ In case Q.6 and WP3 should not meet at that time depending on the
>interim achievements, Q.D,F,G,1-5/16 will meet in the US, San Jose or
>Raleigh, thanks to the offer of Cisco.
>
>3/ Q.6 is now working in Japan and will have a definite answer next
>Friday if they meet in Geneva during the mentioned week next
>February. So our final decision will be made at that time. Please
>stay tuned on this mailinglist.
>
>4/ For this Rapporteur meeting, Paul Jones acts as meeting organizer,
>and myself as document manager.

--
Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae
e-mail: okubo at giti.waseda.ac.jp
*******************************************************************
YRP Office
Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI)
Waseda University
   YRP Ichibankan 312                           Tel: +81 468 47 5406
   3-4 Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa-ken  Fax: +81 468 47 5413
   239-0847 Japan

GITI Headquarter
   29-7 Waseda University Bldg.                 Tel: +81 3 5286 3831
   1-3-10 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo      Fax: +81 3 5286 3832
   169-0051 Japan
*******************************************************************

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at lists.intel.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at lists.intel.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For
help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at lists.intel.com 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at lists.intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.packetizer.com/pipermail/sg16-avd/attachments/20021218/3455f3e5/attachment-0004.html>