h235v2

[wu.yongming at ZTE.COM.CN]

Paul,

(For the record...) The change is OK by me.

Pete.

=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware
pete at tech-know-ware.com
+44 1473 635863
=============================================

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej at PACKETIZER.COM>
To: <ITU-SG16 at echo.jf.INTEL.COM>
Sent: 25 April 2002 00:38
Subject: H.460.1 editorial correction


> Dear Experts,
>
> I received a consultation from the TSB regarding H.460.1, as to whether it
> would be proper to introduce a clarification for text in the third
paragraph
> of Section 7.2. Specifically, the proposed change is from
>
> "If the feature is defined using ASN.1, then it is recommended that the
PER
> encoding rules be used. ..."
>
> to
>
> "If the feature is defined using ASN.1, then it is recommended that the
> basic aligned variant of the PER encoding rules be used. ..."
>
> I personally support the correction since all H.323 equipment uses the
basic
> aligned variant for PER encoding and using anything else would be
incorrect.
> I would like to give the OK to the TSB for implementing this editorial
> correction, but would like to confirm with you whether there are any
> concerns with this change.  We could of course incorporate it via an
> Implementers Guide later on, but we have the opportunity to have it right
> from the start. If you have concerns, please let me know ASAP but
preferably
> not later than April 29, 2002.
>
> Best Regards,
> Paul