Implementors Guide not normative?

Christian Groves Christian.Groves at ERICSSON.COM.AU
Thu Oct 11 23:29:37 EDT 2001


G'Day Glen,

Thanks for listing the proposals I think it goes some way to clarifying
what H.248v2 is. I also note that there are 3 proposals for the Dublin
meeting to H.248v2 these are:
AVD-2120 :Auditing Context Properties
(ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0110_Dub/AVD-2120.zip)
AVD-2122 :H.248v2 Profile Handling
(ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0110_Dub/AVD-2122.zip)
AVD-2124 :Additions to the H.248 Multiplex Descriptor
(ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0110_Dub/AVD-2124.zip)

Regards, Christian

Glen Freundlich wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
> It's looking to me like the best way to capture the H.248 implementer's
> guide is to issue in February an H.248 V2 that is at least V1+IG. Rather
> than argue abstractly about what else might be in V2, I thought I'd list
> the post-V1 proposals that have been accepted so far:
>
> APC-1911: Change of Capabilities indicated in H.248 ServiceChange (
> ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/till_0012/0008_Por/APC-1911.zip )
>
> APC-1913: Improved Auditing in H.248 Version 2 (
> ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/till_0012/0008_Por/APC-1913.zip )
>
> APC-2002: Signal on Root for H248v2 (
> ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/till_0012/0011_Gen/APC-2002.zip )
>
> AVD-2068: Improved Auditing in H.248 Version 2 [amends APC-1913] (
> ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0103_Lau/AVD-2068.zip )
>
> D93: Handling of multiple pending transactions in H.248 (
> ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0105_Por/TD-xxx_Transaction_Pending.zip
> )
>
> D129: Extendable Context Properties for H.248 v2 (
> ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0105_Por/DC-xxx_Context_Property_v2.zip
> )
>
> So, that's 5 proposals (note that AVD-2068 amends, or replaces, APC-1913).
> Please take this information into consideration when you form an opinion
> about what should be in V2 and the timing of V2. AVD-2131 for the Dublin
> meeting ( ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0110_Dub/AVD-2131.zip ) shows
> V1 + IG + the accepted proposals listed above. Marcello Pantaleo (your
> friendly H.248 editor) is also creating a document that would show V1 + IG.
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
> Christian Groves wrote:
>
> > G'Day,
> >
> > Personally as I've mentioned in previous meetings I would support the
> > approval of v2 to bring in the changes from the IGs. I feel that a 80
> > page corrigenda to a 134pg H.248v1 isn't very practical. It will also
> > help interoperability if you receive a v2 message then you know exactly
> > to expect. At previous interops different groups have implemented
> > different IG versions.
> >
> > With regards to the 2 year guideline it would be 20 months between the
> > decision and the consent date for the recommendation. By the time the
> > consent period is finished and the recommendation is published it would
> > be very close to 2 years. We have had other recommendations in SG16
> > which have not aligned to the 2 year guideline.
> >
> > Regards, Christian
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> > listserv at mailbag.intel.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list