Implementors Guide not normative?

Glen Freundlich ggf at AVAYA.COM
Thu Oct 11 11:48:09 EDT 2001


Colleagues,

It's looking to me like the best way to capture the H.248 implementer's
guide is to issue in February an H.248 V2 that is at least V1+IG. Rather
than argue abstractly about what else might be in V2, I thought I'd list
the post-V1 proposals that have been accepted so far:

APC-1911: Change of Capabilities indicated in H.248 ServiceChange (
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/till_0012/0008_Por/APC-1911.zip )

APC-1913: Improved Auditing in H.248 Version 2 (
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/till_0012/0008_Por/APC-1913.zip )

APC-2002: Signal on Root for H248v2 (
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/till_0012/0011_Gen/APC-2002.zip )

AVD-2068: Improved Auditing in H.248 Version 2 [amends APC-1913] (
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0103_Lau/AVD-2068.zip )

D93: Handling of multiple pending transactions in H.248 (
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0105_Por/TD-xxx_Transaction_Pending.zip
)

D129: Extendable Context Properties for H.248 v2 (
ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0105_Por/DC-xxx_Context_Property_v2.zip
)

So, that's 5 proposals (note that AVD-2068 amends, or replaces, APC-1913).
Please take this information into consideration when you form an opinion
about what should be in V2 and the timing of V2. AVD-2131 for the Dublin
meeting ( ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0110_Dub/AVD-2131.zip ) shows
V1 + IG + the accepted proposals listed above. Marcello Pantaleo (your
friendly H.248 editor) is also creating a document that would show V1 + IG.

Regards,
Glen


Christian Groves wrote:

> G'Day,
>
> Personally as I've mentioned in previous meetings I would support the
> approval of v2 to bring in the changes from the IGs. I feel that a 80
> page corrigenda to a 134pg H.248v1 isn't very practical. It will also
> help interoperability if you receive a v2 message then you know exactly
> to expect. At previous interops different groups have implemented
> different IG versions.
>
> With regards to the 2 year guideline it would be 20 months between the
> decision and the consent date for the recommendation. By the time the
> consent period is finished and the recommendation is published it would
> be very close to 2 years. We have had other recommendations in SG16
> which have not aligned to the 2 year guideline.
>
> Regards, Christian
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ggf.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 238 bytes
Desc: Card for Glen Freundlich
URL: <https://lists.packetizer.com/pipermail/sg16-avd/attachments/20011011/61a34333/attachment-0004.vcf>


More information about the sg16-avd mailing list