AW: Gatekeeper behavior question

[Guntram Diehl]

Hi Hans,
yes, you have to map IP address + port to an alias. The H.323 standard only
talks about "transport addresses" which have to be mapped. And a transport
address in the IP case consists of addr+port.
Guntram

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Hans Viens [mailto:hviens at MEDIATRIX.COM]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Mai 2001 14:48
> An: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Betreff: Gatekeeper behavior question
>
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I just want to pin point a place on the H.323 standard that
> talk about the
> behavior of a gatekeeper on a specific scenario. My question is: Is it
> mandatory for a gatekeeper to accept the registration of a
> unit using 1 IP
> address and supporting mutiple H.323 endpoint (multiple
> ports) (i.e EP1:
> 192.168.0.1:2000; EP2: 192.168.0.1:2001 ... ) ? Also, is it
> mandatory for a
> gatekeeper to translate the alias of an endpoint with both
> its IP address &
> port number ?
>
> If you could help me to point me to a section in the H.323
> standard, I would
> appreciate it!
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com