Last Call for the SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft

Chip Sharp chsharp at CISCO.COM
Tue Mar 13 12:53:15 EST 2001


Thanks.
I assume since the actual work group mail list is the one given below, that
the safest place to send comments (so they will be taken into account in
the last call) is to this mail list.

:-)

Chip

At 12:30 PM 3/13/2001 -0500, Roy, Radhika R, ALCOO wrote:
>Hi, Chip and All:
>
>The comments can also be sent to the following email listing:
>
>sip-h323 at yahoogroups.com
>
>This is the actual work group mailing list where most of the discussion is
>being taken place for the SIP-H.323 Interworking.
>
>Best regards,
>Radhika R. Roy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Roy, Radhika R, ALCOO
>Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:26 PM
>To: 'Chip Sharp'
>Cc: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM
>Subject: RE: Last Call for the SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft
>
>
>Hi, Chip and All:
>
>Any mailing list will be fine.
>
>However, I would prefer to send the comments in the SG16 mailing list
>because although the respective WG Chairs in the IETF are planning to send
>the notice in their mailing lists to receive comments soon (I am yet to know
>exactly when they will notify it).
>
>Best regards,
>Radhika R. Roy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chip Sharp [mailto:chsharp at cisco.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:47 AM
>To: Roy, Radhika R, ALCOO
>Cc: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.INTEL.COM
>Subject: Re: Last Call for the SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft
>
>
>Roy,
>Thanks for the notice.
>
>To which mail list should comments be sent (SG16, sip, iptel, megaco or
>spirit)?
>
>Thanks,
>Chip
>
>At 10:57 AM 3/13/2001 -0500, Roy, Radhika R, ALCOO wrote:
> >Hi, Everyone:
> >
> >We are pleased to let you know that the last call for the following draft
> >has been requested in the SIP, IPTEL, MEGACO and SPIRIT WG:
> >
> >http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-
>r
> >eqs-02.txt
> >
> >Authors: Hemant Agrawal, Radhika R. Roy, Vipin Palawat, Alan Johnston,
> >Charles Agboh, David Wang, Kundan Singh, and  Henning Schulzrinne
> >
> >Abstract: This document describes the requirements for the logical entity
> >known as the SIP-H.323 Interworking Function (SIP-H.323 IWF) that will
>allow
> >the interworking between the SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) and H.323
> >protocols.
> >
> >Our objective is to obtain an informational RFC number for this draft.
> >
> >So, it is, therefore, requested to provide your comments by March 27, 2001.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Radhika R. Roy
> >
> >AT&T
> >Room 3D-2C09
> >200 S. Laurel Avenue
> >Middletown, NJ 07748, USA
> >Tel: +1 732 420 1580
> >Email: rrroy at att.com
> >
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> >listserv at mailbag.intel.com
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Chip Sharp                       Consulting Engineering
>Cisco Systems
>-------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Chip Sharp                       Consulting Engineering
Cisco Systems
-------------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list