AW: Corrections to Mobile-UIM
Paul E. Jones
paulej at PACKETIZER.COM
Wed Jan 17 10:34:51 EST 2001
Yes, I did.. thanks for pointing that out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Horvath Ernst" <ernst.horvath at SIEMENS.AT>
To: <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 4:44 AM
Subject: AW: Corrections to Mobile-UIM
> when changing GSM-UIM element tmsi you deleted the word OPTIONAL. This
> should be re-inserted because tmsi should certainly not become mandatory.
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej at ACM.ORG]
> > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 17. Jänner 2001 07:16
> > An: ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
> > Betreff: Corrections to Mobile-UIM
> > Folks,
> > In the past week or so, the specifications of the mobile number
> > definitions-- particularly for GSM-UIM-- were discussed and
> > changes were
> > deemed necessary.
> > I have made changes as recommended by the Annex H and Annex
> > E/H.246 editors.
> > Please find the attached document with the list of
> > corrections for H.323v4
> > and H.225.0v4. In particular, the first GSM-UIM type in
> > section 2.5 has
> > been modified since the last time I e-mailed this draft.
> > Please review the changes and any other relevant ASN.1 changes.
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com
More information about the sg16-avd