Enforcing symmetric operation in the context of slow start fo r H. 323v4
Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM
Fri Sep 8 14:26:37 EDT 2000
Yes, it is safe. I mean, it can't be any worse than it already is, right?
:-) H.323v1, v2, and v3 EPs _should_ support this new procedure.
However--and this is important--they are still compliant even if they don't
whereas v4 EPs would not be compliant. For example, our v3 EPs do not
currently obey this procedure, but they are still compliant.
Smith Micro Software, Inc.
From: Danail Kirov [mailto:DanailK at VERTICAL.COM]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 1:01 PM
To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
Subject: Re: Enforcing symmetric operation in the context of slow start
fo r H. 323v4
Since the proposed procedure simply defines implementation details at
application level and redifines the meaning of caps which already exist
H.323v2, there is nothing that would prevent an H.323v2 compliant
to make use of this procedure for enforcing symmetric operation.
Is it safe to recommend this procedure as the prefered approach for
endpoints as well?
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com
More information about the sg16-avd