okubo at GITI.WASEDA.AC.JP
Fri Oct 27 08:06:36 EDT 2000
At 04:08 PM 10/24/00 +0200, Baese Gero wrote:
>Dear Mr. Aronson,
>since the last meeting in Portland there is a discussion concerning Annex I,
>unfortunately we haven't heard your opinion as an expert on this area.
>What do you think about the discussed technical topics as well as the
I don't want to weigh-in with an opinion on the technical topics, other
than that I am impressed with how deeply this is being worked.
>provided test conditions ? Can you please comment on that ?
As for the test conditions, I think they will work. I could see other
possibilities, but there would be some political issues there.
>Thank you very much.
>For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
>listserv at mailbag.intel.com
I would also like to know:
1) Is there some way to quantify the relative complexities of each proposal?
2) What is the status of this work in the IETF?
3) Are there any IPR issues with either proposal?
33 Lake Shore Ave.
Beverly, MA 01915-1907
E-mail: baronson at ieee.org
Voice: +1 978-232-3994
Fax: +1 978-232-9220
Mobile: +1 978-902-0768
Video: H.320, H.323, and H.324
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com
More information about the sg16-avd