(no subject)

[David Mary]

Charles, All,

> Is third party registration supported in H.323 V2, V3, V4?
What's your application?

According to "original intent", the answer is "yes".  However this will
surprise a lot of people and I doubt you'll find many gatekeepers to support
it.  It all comes down to a couple of strange-looking "sequence of"s in RRQ.  I
was reliably informed some time ago that the original intent was that IF RRQ
gives more than one callSignalAddresses, it should give the same number of
rasAddresses and either none or the same number of terminalAliases.  Similarly
if giving more than one rasAddress there should be the same number of
callSignalAddresses  Then the first element in each list maps to the first
element of the others, the second to the second etc.  My assumption is that RCF
or RRJ ought to be sent only to the first rasAddress in the list.
However, as I said before, this is an undocumented "original intent", and the
ASN.1 that came out of it is far from the best way to achieve it.  I don't know
if anybody actually handles multiple entries in these fields (apart from
terminalAlias) or, if they do, HOW they handle them.

Does anyone out there with a gatekeeper have any input on whether or how they
handle this?

Charles,

I'm cross-posting this to the H.323 implementors list - you may get more idea
of what's actually implemented from there.

Regards,
Chris
--
Dr Chris Purvis -- Development Manager
ISDN Communications Ltd, The Stable Block, Ronans, Chavey Down Road
Winkfield Row, Berkshire.  RG42 6LY  ENGLAND
Phone: +44 1344 899 007
Fax:   +44 1344 899 001

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com