v4 dependent on v2?

Paul Long plong at PACKETIZER.COM
Thu Nov 2 03:01:59 EST 2000


Paul,

Oh, okay. I thought it was referring to old behavior that was no longer
defined in the current version. We should remove references to particular
versions, including version number and year.

Paul Long
ipDialog

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E. Jones [mailto:paulej at packetizer.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 1:11 AM
To: plong at ipdialog.com; ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com
Subject: Re: v4 dependent on v2?


Paul,

One could easily remove the years from those sentences and the text would
still be accurate.  I believe the intent was not to lock the endpoint to a
particular version, but to emphasize a specific procedure first defined in
the publication of that year.

Paul

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com



More information about the sg16-avd mailing list