FECC and remote device control

Roni Even roni_e at ACCORD.CO.IL
Tue Nov 14 07:26:48 EST 2000


Bian,
The reason I strted the thread is because some companies have done some FECC based on H.281 and not H.283/H.282. We are trying to find a solution for the problem by talking with the different implementors incuding Polycom, PictureTel, VCON, RadVision and Accord. If you are aware of other implmentations please let us know. We hope to come with a solution soon and I will post the suggestion tp the list
Thanks
Roni Even
Accord Networks
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bian 
  To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:14 PM
  Subject: FECC and remote device control


  Dear Paul, experts:
       Some H.323 Endpoints(Such as VCON) declear that they support FECC using H.281. How do we achieve interoperability with them ? Can we use H.281 in the context of H.323?
  Thanks
    
  Bian Xuegong
   
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Paul E. Jones 
    To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM 
    Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 3:04 AM
    Subject: Re: FECC and remote device control


    Roni,
     
    FECC in the context of an H.323 call is supposed to be done using H.282 and H.283 through H.245. 
     
    Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.packetizer.com/pipermail/sg16-avd/attachments/20001114/08052b0e/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the sg16-avd mailing list