[H.323 Mobility:] Status check & practical things

[Jaakko Sundquist]

I apologize for having sent on the e_mail exploder an mail in French and I send it again with english version
The calling party (and his GK) cannot only know whether a called party is fixed or mobile if this called party belongs to the same country (same numbering plan) and this may even be no more true if Number Portablity applies.
A French GK has at my knowledge no clue on the Australian or swedish numbering plan
     Best regards and again apologizes for the french message
        Laurent  .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
      V    Laurent Thiebaut      tel: +33 (0)1 3077 0645
A L C A T E L                    e.mail:laurent.thiebaut at alcatel.fr
---------------------------------------------------------------------------




Laurent Thiebaut <Laurent.Thiebaut at ALCATEL.FR> on 26/05/2000 09:53:59

Please respond to Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study Group 16 <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>



 To:      ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com

 cc:      (bcc: Laurent THIEBAUT/FR/ALCATEL)



 Subject: Re: [H.323 Mobility] clarification





-------------- next part --------------





Francois-Xavier je ne connais pas le contexte mais a priori:
   le calling party (et son GK) ne peuvent savoir que l'appel? est un mobile que si cet appel? apprtient au meme pays. Un GK francais n'a a mon avis aucune idee du plan de num Australien ou suedois
   J'organise lundi une r?union de debriefing du dernier 3GPP R00. Si ca t'interresse.
laurent




Francois-Xavier Derome <Francois-Xavier.Derome at ALCATEL.FR> on 25/05/2000 13:13:17

Please respond to Mailing list for parties associated with ITU-T Study Group 16 <ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com>



 To:      ITU-SG16 at mailbag.cps.intel.com

 cc:      (bcc: Laurent THIEBAUT/FR/ALCATEL)



 Subject: [H.323 Mobility] clarification





-------------- next part --------------


hi,
Before writing a contribution for the annex H, I have a question for clarification.
I didn't see a requirement that the calling party and the calling GK should not be aware that the called party is a mobile user and is eventually at a visiting location.
What is the feeling of the group ? Shouldn't we add this requirement in the annex or does anybody disagree with it ?

fx

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com