H.323 Annex O
orit at radvision.com
Tue May 30 10:57:20 EDT 2000
As the editor of H.323 Annex O, I would like to expand Roni's precise recap
and add a few words about the objectives of Annex O. (BTW, the full version
appears in APC-1776 and TD-40a from Osaka meeting)
H.323 specification defines means for building multimedia communication
services over any Packet Based Network, among them Internet. However, in
order to deploy efficient and globally interoperable Internet based H.323
systems, definitions for using Internet protocols and technologies
(complementary to H.323) in context of H.323 Specification should be
This work will be organized in Annex O named Internet protocols and
Technologies (complementary to H.323) in context of H.323 Specification.
The first material towards Annex O addresses the use of DNS technology in
context of H.323 and includes (1) definition of H323-URL scheme and (2) use
cases of H323-URL and other URL schemes in H.323 messages and H.323
I hope and believe, that H.246 new Appendix (H.323-SIP Interworking) and
corresponding attempts in IETF (listed by Mr. Roy) will define their
solution(s) in accordance with the procedures of Annex O.
575 Corporate Drive Suite 420
Mahwah, NJ 07430
Tel: 1 201 529 4300 (230)
Fax: 1 201 529 3516
orit at radvision.com
From: Roni Even <Roni_e at ACCORD.CO.IL>
To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM <ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM>
Date: Sunday, May 28, 2000 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: H.323 Annex O
>The summary from Q14 states that SIP-H.323 interworking will be an appendix
>that will map messages for simple audio calls. and would defines preferred
>interworking mode. See the text bellow from TD-21b
>6.1.1 APC-1776 - Terms of Reference for H.323 - Internet Interworking
>[H.323-Internet Interworking Group] [joint with Q.12, Q.13]
>Q.15 discussed some SIP matters - SDP does not currently provide enough
>detail to describe H.263+ parameters.
>Call signaling could be captured in an appendix to H.246. This appendix
>would first address simple audio interworking, covering topics such as
>mapping messages between H.323 and SIP. This is work that is currently in
>progress in the IETF (not an official work item at this time, but an
>unofficial task in the SIP working group). This appendix would define the
>"preferred interworking mode" of H.323; we'd expect the SIP experts to
>define the preferred interworking mode of SIP. We need to capture the
>essence of each of the functional entities. Contributions are requested.
>There was agreement that a new annex to H.323 to address how H.323 could
>utilize a variety of internet services. Section 3 of APC-1776 is a good
>basis for this work.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roy, Radhika R, ALARC [SMTP:rrroy at ATT.COM]
>> Sent: Fri, May 26, 2000 9:30 PM
>> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
>> Subject: H.323 Annex O
>> Mr. M. F. TOSCO
>> ITU-T SG16 WP2
>> Dear Mr. TOSCO:
>> We are very much pleased to see that an H.323 Annex O (Internet Protocols
>> and Technologies Complementary to H.323) has been opened in the joint
>> meeting of Q.13/16 and Q.13/16 held in Osaka, Japan on May 15-19, 2000.
>> is expected that this annex will cover the following topics:
>> 1. H.323-SIP Interworking
>> 2. Inteworking between H.323 and other IETF Protocols (e.g., TRIP,
>> With respect to item 1 (H.323-SIP Interworking), it has been noted in the
>> meeting report that the IETF is also working to develop an Informational
>> (a standard track RFC is also a possibility) for the SIP-H.323
>> The way this work in the IETF is progressing is as follows (I believe
>> the editor of H.323 Annex O is also fully aware of this work of the
>> 1. SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements RFC (Informational): by
>> July-December, 2000 (tentative)
>> 2. SIP-H.323 Interworking RFC (Informational): December 2000 - March
>> 2001 (tentative)
>> The Internet-Drafts and documents that are being provided to develop the
>> are as follows:
>> 1. Agrawal, Roy, and Palawat, "SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements,"
>> draft-agrawal-roy-palawat-sip-h323-interworking-00.txt, IETF, June 2000.
>> 2. Singh and Schulzrinne, "Interworking Between SIP/SDP and H.323",
>> draft- singh-sip-h323-00.txt, IETF, January 2000.
>> 3. C. Agbah, "SIP and H.323 Signaling Gateway."
>> It is expected that the SIP-H.323 Interworking RFC will be based
>> on the above documents along with suggestions made via emails and
>> People could take many those contributions to the ITU-T SG16 for the
>> SIP-H.323 Interworking in the last SG16 February'00 meeting. However, it
>> found that many companies and institutions that invented the interworking
>> solution could not afford to provide the membership fees of the ITU-T,
>> some of them even could not afford to make a foreign trip for the
>> meeting. But this has not been the case for the IETF where the email has
>> been good enough to work for developing the standard.
>> Therefore, I am proposing the following to harmonize the work of these
>> organizations so that the complementary standards are created in the
>> SG16 and IETF:
>> 1. Let the IETF produce the SIP-H.323 interworking RFC, while we,
>> ITU-T SG16, will develop the H.323-TRIP and/or other IETF protocols
>> Interworking standard.
>> 2. Should the IETF do not develop the standard track SIP-H.323 RFC,
>> the ITU-T SG16, might consider how IETF's SIP-H.323 Interworking
>> (Informational) RFC can be made a formal standard.
>> I hope this suggestion will be acceptable to all of us.
>> Best regards,
>> Radhika R. Roy
>> AT&T Delegation Manager in the ITU-T SG16 (WP1, WP2, & WP3)
>> 200 Laurel Avenue, Middletown, NJ 07748, USA
>> +1 732 420 1580 Tel
>> +1 732 368 1195 Fax
>> rrroy at att.com
>> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
>> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
>For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
>listserv at mailbag.intel.com
For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
listserv at mailbag.intel.com
More information about the sg16-avd