On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4

[Francois Audet]

We've made it even clearer in v4. Including H.245 and H.225.0 elements.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Long [mailto:Plong at SMITHMICRO.COM]
> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 5:21 PM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: Re: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4
>
>
> Pete,
>
> This is already covered in H.323, so there is no need to say
> it again or in
> another way. Do you think that the text, below, is deficient
> in some way?
> Seems pretty clear to me.
>
> 8.2.2/H.323v3: "...intermediate entities shall ensure that
> H.245 messages
> encapsulated in Q.931 messages are forwarded to the other
> endpoint even if
> the Q.931 message in which the H.245 message is encapsulated would be
> consumed and not forwarded to the other endpoint. This is
> accomplished by
> transferring the encapsulated H.245 message into a Facility
> message with the
> h323-message-body set to empty."
>
> Paul Long
> Smith Micro Software, Inc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Cordell [mailto:pete at TECH-KNOW-WARE.COM]
> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 12:57 PM
> To: ITU-SG16 at MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
> Subject: On TD26 - Fast TCS and M/S negotiation in H.323v4
>
>
> I note that TD-26 has been accepted to show how TCS can be conveyed in
> parallel with fast start.
>
> However, the example shows the use of call proceeding for
> receiving TCS
> back
> from the remote endpoint.  This is not typically an
> end-to-end message,
> and
> therefore how the procedure works with the gatekeeper routed
> model needs
> to
> be addressed.
>
> Possible solutions are:
>
> 1. Refer to the new text that says it is the responsibility of the
> gatekeeper to forward any tunnelled message for which none is
> available
> using FACILITY.  (There might be some objection from some to using a
> facility message this early in the call setup process though.)
>
> 2. Restrict the tunnelling (and probably the fast start info) to
> Alerting,
> Connect and Facility, which generally are end-to-end.  I
> believe this is
> compatible with the latest procedures for deciding when fast start has
> been
> ignored.
>
> Which ever option is chosen, it would also be nice to have a
> picture for
> it
> also!
>
> Pete
>
> =============================================
> Pete Cordell
> pete at tech-know-ware.com
> =============================================
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> For help on this mail list, send "HELP ITU-SG16" in a message to
> listserv at mailbag.intel.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.packetizer.com/pipermail/sg16-avd/attachments/20000520/cbfea702/attachment-0004.html>